What's even left for them to do with Steve Rogers at this point?
I'm not trying to be Mr. Cynical who comes along and stomps on everyone's fun, but I just feel like there's nothing left for them to do with Steve now. They're obviously bringing him back for the nostalgia and to create hype for these movies, but it doesn't feel like there's any good story-based reasons for ruining his existing character arc and bringing him back.
Throughout the course of The Infinity Saga, Steve has....
* Had a whole trilogy of solo movies
* Led The Avengers 4 times
* Said "Avengers, Assemble!"
* Had many different costumes from the comics
* Wielded Mjolnir
* Interacted with tons of different heroes (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Thor, Hulk, Wanda, Black Widow, Guardians of The Galaxy, etc.)
* Appeared in 9 MCU movies over the span of 8 years
* Given the shield to Sam and declared him the new Captain America
* Had his happy ending with Peggy
What can they possibly do in 'Doomsday' and 'Secret Wars' that will make it feel like it was worth ruining his happy ending?
Throughout the course of The Infinity Saga, Steve has....
* Had a whole trilogy of solo movies
* Led The Avengers 4 times
* Said "Avengers, Assemble!"
* Had many different costumes from the comics
* Wielded Mjolnir
* Interacted with tons of different heroes (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Thor, Hulk, Wanda, Black Widow, Guardians of The Galaxy, etc.)
* Appeared in 9 MCU movies over the span of 8 years
* Given the shield to Sam and declared him the new Captain America
* Had his happy ending with Peggy
What can they possibly do in 'Doomsday' and 'Secret Wars' that will make it feel like it was worth ruining his happy ending?
Commentaires
...or they just offered him a lot of money and he couldn't refuse.
Tobey and Andrew were also only brought back so the studio(s) could make a bunch of money, but they still came up with interesting character arcs for them that felt very fitting. It didn't FEEL like a cheap gimmick. It felt right.
Gifted!"

Noooooo waaaaayyy
The "consume, consume, consume" mindset will get you nowhere.
If it’s poorly written and feels shoe horned then that’s a good time to begin complaining.
I have no clue what they could possibly add in Doomsday that would make it feel like "ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, THAT'S why they brought him back! this makes his previous ending even better!!"
This is probably the reasons for the incursions.
Cap’s origin, Robert Redford’s character in The Winter Soldier, bringing Bucky back AS The Winter Soldier, Civil War, Ultron, and many more. All those ideas and characters came from the comics.
Kill him.
If he was really going to be IN the movie, they wouldn't need to spoil his presence in the first trailer. We're already hyped enough from RDJ returning. They showed him in the first trailer to get us hyped about something they will take away from us.
I'm in two minds, I think he had a near perfect run up to Endgame and he's my favourite character so I'm stoked he's back. However every further appearance risks tarnishing that run. If Doomsday sucks I'm going to wish he stayed away.
None of them, just Steve.
And his "happy ending" was completely out of character (and actually I sort of hate that, they had him do something completely and utterly out of character and now what? They're going to blame him for it? Somehow make this all his fault?). But none the less it was out of character, so there isn't any particular reason he should get to keep it. One would have hoped they did it sympathetically or turned it on it's head(he didn't actually go with Peggy, they just danced to get closure, and then something else happened that kept him from getting home but Old Steve from the future at the end of Endgame knew it would all turn out relatively all right(from the future because the serum makes Steve age very slowly, he could theoretically live at least a few hundred years, meaning Old Steve actually would have come back from the future to give Sam the Shield).
As for Sam, Steve Rogers is coming back, he doesn't need to be Captain America. Sam can still be Captain America. It's happened plenty of times in the comics.
He didn't really have a trilogy. Civil War was taken over by Iron Man, he had as much screentime and more dialogue AND the Russo's literally said they were aiming for a 50/50 split with the test audiences. What other solo hero had to share their final solo film with another character where the sim was basically to make the other character as much if not more "sympathetic?
>None of them, just Steve.
Yes, he did have a trilogy. That's an objective fact. You can hate Civil War all you want, but it was a Captain America movie. Steve and Bucky's relationship was the catalyst for the whole storyline, and Evans had the most screentime of anyone. Sure, it feels in many ways like an Avengers 2.5, but it was a Captain America film.
>And his "happy ending" was completely out of character (and actually I sort of hate that, they had him do something completely and utterly out of character and now what? They're going to blame him for it? Somehow make this all his fault?). But none the less it was out of character, so there isn't any particular reason he should get to keep it.
The whole point of his ending was that it was out of character. In the first Avengers movie, Steve told Tony he wasn't the kind of guy who would lay down his life for others and Tony told Steve that everything special about him came from the serum. In the end, they both proved each other wrong (Tony made the ultimate sacrifice and Steve was worthy to hold Mjolnir). Tony also told Steve to get a life, which Steve did by going back to the 40s and being with Peggy ("I got some of that life Tony told me about"). After Endgame, his mission was completed and he decided to finally do something selfish for once. He had changed from beginning to end, which is what we call a character arc.