After rewatching the MCU over the last month up to Endgame, Steve and Tony were never friends.
When I got to Civil War, it tried to play it up as two best friends being dramatically split apart, but over the MCU they basically never interact positively. It's not even like a rivalry friendship or like two brothers who kinda hate eachother but really love eachother.
They're only basically ever at eachother's throats when they directly interact. Tony always seems resentful of Cap for how his dad talked about him or his idealism, Cap only ever seems resentful of Tony's personality and sees him as spoiled. They have a little banter in Cap telling Tony not to swear one time, but even in the Ultron party scene they don't positively interact directly. The most time they have together is arguing while splitting wood in Ultron.
At no point do I really feel like these two were good friends or comrades. They act like begrudging co-workers, so when Civil War comes around and Tony feels all betrayed that Cap never told him Bucky killed his parents, or "He's my friend" and "So was I..." lines are popped out, it doesn't feel well set up and more like a missed opportunity. It's not as silly as Xavier and Magneto being like "Haha oh yes my old friend it certainly is always pleasant to see you when you try to kill me and all of humanity," but does feel undersold.
It's not until Endgame that it seems like they really come together over their shared failure after a bit of initial bickering immediately after. I'm wondering where this goes in Doomsday when Doom has Tony's face and Steve is involved.
They're only basically ever at eachother's throats when they directly interact. Tony always seems resentful of Cap for how his dad talked about him or his idealism, Cap only ever seems resentful of Tony's personality and sees him as spoiled. They have a little banter in Cap telling Tony not to swear one time, but even in the Ultron party scene they don't positively interact directly. The most time they have together is arguing while splitting wood in Ultron.
At no point do I really feel like these two were good friends or comrades. They act like begrudging co-workers, so when Civil War comes around and Tony feels all betrayed that Cap never told him Bucky killed his parents, or "He's my friend" and "So was I..." lines are popped out, it doesn't feel well set up and more like a missed opportunity. It's not as silly as Xavier and Magneto being like "Haha oh yes my old friend it certainly is always pleasant to see you when you try to kill me and all of humanity," but does feel undersold.
It's not until Endgame that it seems like they really come together over their shared failure after a bit of initial bickering immediately after. I'm wondering where this goes in Doomsday when Doom has Tony's face and Steve is involved.
Commentaires
But I would say they were friends. Stark wouldn't have gone on a rant in Endgame if he didn't.
(Granted - I can't say that all the Avengers team members fighting/bickering with each other means they *aren't* family. Even Drax corrects Nebula when she claims the Guardians fighting all the time means they aren't friends 😆 Just saying I really liked the change of tone in *FF.*)
I agree with you that Tony and Steve were never friends. They were coworkers. All of the Avengers were
One of the cringiest things in Endgame was how little any of them cared about Thor as he drank himself into a deep depression. Even Hawkeye, who also lost everything, seemed to not care and even acted like he was sane compared to him…forgetting that he’s been on a murderous rampage for several years. They were all basically desperately trying to hold in their fat jokes.
You even see some of this in some of the post-Endgame movies. Does Bruce Banner or Sam Wilson care that Peter Parker was framed and doxxed? Did Clint check on Wanda? Did Strange tell any of them Wanda’s “dead”? The answers to all of those questions are probably “no”, because they don’t care.
The only one who thought of the Avengers as a “family” was Natasha, who probably was so willing to sacrifice herself because she loved them all, even though they all barely cared about her.
As tragic as this is, however, I think her legacy will be the thing that propels the Avengers forward through her sister Yelena and the Thunderbolts. That movie emphasized the importance of all of them actually caring about each other and lifting each other up, not forgetting about one another when the big threat was defeated
I think there’s a reason why Sam’s team was formed offscreen. Because Sam’s not a good leader, and he’s not even a good teammate, so his team assembling is unimportant because it’s doomed to fail. If I had to guess, he’s the one with the issue of the Thunderbolts being the New Avengers in Avengers Tower, not Bucky. Which is remarkably petty, because a true leader and hero would wanna work with them, because they clearly earned their hero statuses.
From a narrative and legacy perspective, it makes way more sense for Yelena to be the leader of the Avengers to
The whole world went thru a collective traumatic event. Everyone was in their own mess.
Obviously the is at the fault of Marvel having fifty thousand different writers and directors and making each movie so disconnected from the rest that it leaves these plot holes. Even Gunn said he was glad Taika took care of splitting the Guardians and Thor because he wasn’t even going to mention Thor in his movie, which feels really shitty. They need directors and writers who care about the WHOLE story, not just THEIR story.
And I agree that the snap was a huge traumatic event for everyone. The mistake they made was not trying to lift each other up when they were at their lowest. Again, it’s just kinda odd how everyone mocks Thor because I guess it’s more funny the hot jacked god is a fat drunk, when they’re all supposedly grieving
These people cared about each other, to a certain degree. But their collective emotional intelligence scales a lot lower than the Thunderbolts. I could never see all of the OG Avengers saving one of their own with an emotional, and extremely earned group hug, for instance
It’s not because they’re indifferent to each others pain, they just tend to see each other more as coworkers than friends. At least, that’s the general impression I got. To me, that was set up in Age of Ultron and then proved in Civil War, when it’s emphasized how easy it was to tear them apart
Civil War was Tony's fault.
Thor was an arrogant God if you recall and viewed humans as pets to protect and not equals. Do you view toddlers as equals?
Thunderbolts only got to where they were by happenstance.
They are coworkers. Buck and Steve were friends. Natasha and Steve became friends after Winter Soldier. Buck and Falcon were friends.
Tony and Rhodey were friends.
Thats it.
But they all cared about each other to a point. But these are all heroes and gods and when they say leave them alone, you leave them alone. Or if they want to disappear then they do.
In general when selling if characters see each other as acquaintances, coworkers, friends or found family I think it depends on a combination of the actors onscreen chemistry together, the story told with them and how the actors play the story that’s given to them.
Your line about the avengers not really caring about each other reminds me of in Agatha all along, during the attempted banishment Billy outright tells Agatha that he doesn’t really care what happens to her anymore. However right after his eyes are welling up with tears and he’s devolving into frustration and desperation as she fights back and begs with him. He obviously does care a lot and it’s breaking his heart to hurt her and their relationship. I just mention that as an example within the mcu to show how it can be demonstrated when the characters do really care about each other and are not indifferent to the plight of someone who is close to them.
>"***If I had to guess***, he’s \[Sam\] the one with the issue of the Thunderbolts being the New Avengers in Avengers Tower, not Bucky. ***Which is remarkably petty***, because a true leader and hero would wanna work with them, because they clearly earned their hero statuses."
This would be petty if it's true, but we don't know that it's true.
It’s also kinda based on Sam just…willing to let Isaiah Bradley get executed in prison in Brave New World even after it’s pretty obvious he had no control over his actions. And not wanting Ant-Man on his team
However, the idea that he can sue for the name just because he has Steve's shield is so weird. Steve didn't own the name either. They took it from Fury's initiative. And then, in a way, everyone that showed up at the battle against Thanos is "an Avenger" because Steve told them to assemble. So both Bucky and Sam are already "Avenger***s***".
My secret head canon is that Sam is pretending to rival with them as a rouse and that he and Bucky are coordinating behind Val's back or something. Because I can't see Sam being that petty.
Like, she’s the reason you get to be with your family after you murdered alot of people and are never gonna pay for it. Maybe…do more than just live that simple quiet life on the farm? Call Wanda? You know, the sister of the man who saved your life and you named your son after?
Steve + Bucky
Steve + Peggy
Nat + Clint
We just don’t see enough screen time of them being close to justify the amount of dialogue and plot surrounding their closeness. It is similar to Star Wars prequels/revenge of the sith with Anakin and Obi-Wan.
HOWEVER, somehow the filmmakers do their darndest on all other fronts to make us feel like we saw all that closeness. And boy, it works.
“You owe me one, and not for saving your skin for the tenth time.”
“Ninth time. That business on Cato Meimoidia doesn’t, doesn’t count.”
Yep, that was supposed to show they were “friends” lol
But when the final “you were my brother, Anakin” comes…you can’t help but feel it.
Like, they have their spats and disagreements but they still respect each other and work together well overall, even though (and I would say even say especially since) they approach problems from such different viewpoints, and they might have some simple conversations about "what did you do over the weekend" and other personal but not super deep topics when they are at work.
But they also aren't going to really hang out together outside of work, ya know?
Usually because Tony f-ed up and Steve had to fix things.
They could trust each other so much, that Stark tries to create an AI behind Steve’s back, not once but twice.
The whole dinner party scene is meant to show us this in ultron. It’s said they’ve all been together for a while taking down hydra bases. Yes it’s off screen but it’s pretty clear they are actually friends and I think RDJ and Chris Evans and Chris Hemsworth had enough chemistry I believed it.
People burnt on the mcu will ignore it but those still in will love it.
Tony also created Ultron to "save his friends"- the very reason they were in all that mess in the first place.
>As the head of the Avengers.... Bucky (who at the time was a terrorist) wasn't a friend at all.
Tony wasn't the "head" of the Avengers, Steve was. And Bucky wasn't ever a terrorist. To be a terrorist one has to have actually \*commited\* an act of terrorism - not just be suspected of one you didn't commit.
Besides, Bucky's status in Tony's eyes is irrelevant: would Tony sacrifice Pepper or Happy "for the team" if they were in Bucky's situation? No.
Also "the government told me to do it" isn't an excuse since the government also tells people to commit war crimes and other henious acts.
Would Tony sacrifice his closest friend and/or his girlfriend vs would he give up a (not) terrorist to the government. Tony didn't know Bucky at all, why would he care if Bucky was turned in? The woman at the very beginning brings up Sokovia and it's the main reason he decides to sign the accords. He feels responsible but feels hes also trying to get his friends from being arrested like the government wants to arrest Bucky. Don't forget that when Tony goes to the super prison cap's team asks him "what did you think was going to happen" or something along those lines.
Ultron was supposed intended to be a peace keeping force. "A suit of armor around the world" kinda like how there were Ultron bots in MOM movie.
Juat going to stop you right there. Bucky \*didn't\* kill the King of Wakanda. Zemo did and framed him. That's like the whole point and you'd know that if you'd ***actually*** watched Civil War.
>Would Tony sacrifice his closest friend and/or his girlfriend vs would he give up a (not) terrorist to the government
Yes, that's the problem. Tony considers people who he doesn't directly like to be disposable and their lives worthless. Bucky is Cap's best friend and Cap knows he's innocent of the crime he was accused of. Tony is expecting Cap to make sacrifices he wouldn't make himself.
>
>He feels responsible but feels hes also trying to get his friends from being arrested like the government wants to arrest Bucky. Don't forget that when Tony goes to the super prison cap's team asks him "what did you think was going to happen" or something along those lines.
I get the feeling at this point you've only watched clips of Civil War. The team got arrested because Tony was chasing Bucky at the behest of Ross- and it turns out Bucky was thee wrong guy after all.
Tony then broke the Accords himsefl by going to Siberia mere minutes after making that speech.
>Ultron was supposed intended to be a peace keeping force. "A suit of armor around the world" kinda like how there were Ultron bots in MOM movie.
The catalyst for Ultron's creation was Tony's fear of loss. Good motives don't justify bad actions and all that.
I'd call that an optimistic exaggeragtion. Tony's actions were still the reason half the team were in The Raft and Steve was a fugitive. It was going to take more than "yeah, sorry I was wrong" to fix that.
Plus Tony had just alienated Clint by shooting his mouth off and revealing his family as well as Natasha by laughing about T'Challa telling Ross about her involvement in the airport fight. He was simply bargaining on the fact Steve didn't know about either of those things.
Plus the fact Steve didn't tell Tony about his parents says Steve knew how vindictive Tony could be. He probably believed Tony would hunt down and murder Bucky if he knew. Which he very much would.
"Oh yeah, id kill for all of them, why?"
Only then I realized all we did was make fun of each other.
None of the Avengers felt like friends to me, by the way, not just Steve and Tony (except from Natasha and Clint, but they had this relationship before the Avengers were formed). They feel like colleagues. That dinner party scene, it just looks like these fancy business parties a company throw for their workers or the ones when you are supposed to mingle and establish business or academic connections or whatnot. Work-related social event. Not just fun, intimate event the Avengers throw for themselves because they genuinely just want to spend some fun time together. I really wanted to feel they are close friends, but their relationships never felt more than a coworker level of friendship to me. I hate Ragnarok, but Thor's "it's a friend from work" actually rang true to me. It really feels that's all they are.
I feel like they did a good job showing their bond AND their deep disagreements, it makes them complex and realistic in their relationship.
I think I was looking for something that wasn't there and apparently never meant to be. I don't know, people who fight alongside each other for quite a while usually develop strong bond with each other. I expected something more like that. I wish we saw them care about each other more, instead of things like that needless love story between Natasha and Bruce (imo) no one asked for.
Specifically about Steve and Tony, I knew that in the comics Steve and Tony were great friends and in Civil War they were the heads of the two opposite groups of superheroes in conflict with each other. So beyond the fight over two different ideologies/stances, there was also the personal aspect, two friends who love each other and are now at odds, and they both suffer for it. I expected to have at least something of that sort in the movies so I thought we would see them much closer in AoU, or in the process of that, but it never happened. And yeah, yeah, I know the comics and the movies are two different things, but I was still disappointed.
Also: "It seems to run on some form of electricity."
"Well, you're not wrong."
Was a bit snarky, but A. Tony just is snarky. And B. I felt like that was more Tony snarking at himself because he should have known that Steve would have no clue. Of anyone on the planet, Steve would have the least clue what he was looking at.
Remember what Fury said: "There was an idea, to bring together a group of remarkable people, to fight the battles we never could.". Notice he didn't say a group of FRIENDS.
And at the end of The Avengers, what happens? They all go their separate ways, and when asked what'll happen if they're need again, Fury says they'll re-form. That means The Avengers were always supposed to be temporary, and as such friendship isn't a prerequisite in much the same way we can go to work with people, even enjoy each other while there, but not call them friends.
Having a whole Avengers complex with them all hanging out all the time was never the plan, and it makes you wonder how they actually got to that point in Civil War. My own suspicion is this was just more of Tony's hubris on display, more of his "suit of armor around the world" mentality. Basically, I think in his mind he figured if he built the compound - and I assume it WAS him that built it - and get everyone together all the time because why WOULDN'T Earth's mightiest heroes be around all the time, then you've in a way got that suit of armor around the world.
But that wasn't the original plan from Fury, right?
So, then, why does Tony tell Cap they were friends? I think the simplest explanation is similar to how you might say someone at work is a "friend" even though you don't mean it literally. You really just mean someone you basically like and get along with and spend a fair bit of time together with because of your work. Some people say "work friend" specifically for such cases, but in a clearly tense emotional moment you might not be so precise, and I think that was the deal with Tony at that point. And plus, the man 100% felt super-betrayed, rightly or wrongly, in that moment, and being betrayed by a "friend" feels worse than being betrayed by some work acquaintance, so saying what he did expresses his strong feelings in that moment better than anything else he might have said.
Roll in your notion of resentment and I think you're right, they were never friends... but they were never SUPPOSED to be, and it ultimately really doesn't matter whether they were or not, the emotions throughout their relationship were no less real. And plus, that makes what sure seemed like a true friendship that blossomed after they reconciled in Endgame mean all that much more, not to mention how Steve reacted to Tony's death.
So the only part I'd argue with is saying they were "never" friends. No, I think they were, but only in the very end.
Plus Bruce Banner basically went missing at the end of Age of Ultron and wasn't found again until 2 years later by Thor on another planet.
I mentioned it earlier but I have lifelong long distance friendships from the military with people I’ve spent anywhere between 3-24 months with. The core Avengers were together for a period of almost a year from the fall of SHIELD to AOU which is about a year. Tony in his words became an active duty non combatant aka reserve member from 2015 to 2016 (the events of Civil War). If we go back to the events of the Avengers to Civil War that’s almost 4 years of a relationship whether in person or from afar. That’s well enough time to be friends. Work friends at the minimum and brothers in arms in reality.
Except for one small problem. The idea Tony was "housing everyone" assumes nobody had a job or accommodation outside the Avengers. Yet Sam later says the Avengers were unpaid volunteers.
We also know for a fact Sam already had a career. Clint had a ranch where his wife and kids lived. Steve is shown as having his own apartment in Avengers 1 and Winter Soldier, and there's a reference to him looking for a new one on Age of Ultron. Thor is a Space god and heir to the throne. He's got like a palace in Asgard. They're not homeless and dependent on Tony.
In fact we also know the Avengers compound didn't exist before the fall of SHIELD or the events of Age of Ultron because it's first introduction is in Ant Man, set mere months before Civil War. Ant Man breaks in and finds only Sam at the compound.
>If we go back to the events of the Avengers to Civil War that’s almost 4 years of a relationship whether in person or from afar. That’s well enough time to be friends. Work friends at the minimum and brothers in arms in reality.
Yet in Civil War Stave is unaware of things like Pepper having left Tony or what happened in Iron Man 3 (which resulted in Pepper leaving). Things that close friends would talk about.
And Thor literally calls Bruce a "friend from work" in Ragnorok then has to inform him 2 years have passed.
There are several references to the time they spend togethin Age of Ultron alone.
>Thor were usually off doing their own thing
Was he? He moved to Earth permanently in The Dark World and talks about finding Strucker and the spear "at long last" in Age of Ultron and is familiar with the typical HYDRA defences.
>Tony took very long "breaks"
Tony talks about being on several Avenger missions from before the fall of SHIELD to Age of Ultron and "all their raiding parties".
>Clint was the guy who kept having to be dragged out of semi-retirement.
He was active until Age of Ultron, with Nat making jokes about how he fits in. But also the fact that he trusts the rest of them on the same level as Nat to reveal his family to them shows how much their relationship had moved on, no?
>Plus Bruce Banner basically went missing at the end of Age of Ultron and wasn't found again until 2 years later by Thor on another planet.
They also explicitly say when he goes missing they aren't going to be able to find him easily, but are looking.
They never explain how Bruce ends up on Sakaar. Why would anyone be looking there? How would they be looking there?
But in short, Age of Ultron has multiple expository lines that 2014-2016 were very active "Avenging" years. With 2014 and 2015 having the original 6.
Have you actually watched Dark World? I think you might be confusing it with Love and Thunder because Thor definitely hasn't "moved to earth permanently". Half the movie doesn't even happen on earth and it starts with Loki being taken to Asgard.
There's also multiple references in the movie to him and Jane Foster having broken up because Thor disappeared.
>They never explain how Bruce ends up on Sakaar. Why would anyone be looking there? How would they be looking there?
And the only reason Thor found Bruce was because he was "doing space stuff". The entirety of Ragnarok is set in space, on Sakaaar or on Asgard.
>But also the fact that he trusts the rest of them on the same level as Nat to reveal his family
Um the only reason Clint revealed his family was that they needed somewhere to hide from Ultron. It was an act resulting from necessity, not trust. And it very clearly \*not\* on the same level as Nat who Clint's kids called "Aunt". and who he was gonna name his kid after.
>expository lines that 2014-2016 were very active "Avenging" years. With 2014 and 2015 having the original 6.
Captain America: The Winter Soldier is set in 2014 and only has Cap and Natasha. Not all 6 together. Civil War is set in 2016 and yet Cap wasn't aware Tony had broken up with Pepper and they have to "catch up".
In conclusion the actual events and lines suggest they were together for a few months of 2015 at most.
I think you are leaning toward "Like brothers".
Stark honestly has very few friends. Yeah he can party of loads of people but most of them aren't friends. His whole family is long dead.
Tony trusted Steve enough to fight back to back. To literally die on the same hill. Doesn't mean they hang out at a pub every day to discuss life and everything.
Steve is the same way.
Then for some people co-workers are the only people they know. So yeah Tony's inner circle is really small and the Avengers are inside of it.
In the MCU it works if you fill in the blanks yourself and say that they were buddies off screen and between movies.
Until you watch Iron Man 3 and realize they had basucally no interactions beween Avengers 1 and Age of Ultron.
It doesn't really matter if they seemed like friends to us. It mattered that Tony saw Steve as a friend.
Though it must be said, narcissists are notorious for perceiving almost anything as "betrayal" due to their hypersensitivity and fragile ego.
Then Endgame and Steve dips for Peggy, who happened to refuse any interest in Steve until there was another woman/Bucky fell. I know she was just professional and focusing on the war effort but it’s still crazy that based on that storyline, she is Steve’s soulmate.
What matters is that they are written in parallel (like Zuko and Aang, for a better example)
People work with all sorts of personalities that don’t align, but that doesn’t mean they don’t share a common goal.
I mean…no one’s really friends with the Hulk…not even Banner. LOL
Also, Hawkeye isn’t “friends” with any of them besides his family and Natasha…maybe Nick Fury, but Nick isn’t the trusting, friendly type either.
A lot of traits that make a person “successful” make friendships really difficult. :/
“He’s my friend”
“So was I”
Cap knows the difference between a friend and a teammate / countryman.
Also, you reminded of my favorite line in “Tombstone”
“Ah hell Doc, I got lots of friends.”
“I don’t.”
What about Natasha then? She likes Hulk. He won't let her but she does.
you don’t remember Shark’s “hide the zucchini” comment in Age of Ultron? LOL
I’d say before the events of Avengers (2012) Tony was definitely shedding the selfish manchild nature that had guided him and Steve hadn’t at all adjusted to the 70 years he’d missed. Of COURSE they were antagonistic. After that, though, I think what started as a mutual sense of purpose and respect for each other really did become a very close friendship. There’s real heart ache there in the climax of Civil War when Tony calls Steve his friend. It’s actually pretty heartbreaking. Steve may be the only person besides Pepper and Happy at that point that Tony really does consider a friend. I dunno, just my two cents.
Steve was closer to Sam and Natasha then Tony. Plus if Iron Man 3 is anything to go by there's no evidence he and Steve had any interactions between Avengers 1 and Age of Ultron. Which would be a period of 3 years.
They're very plot driven films.
They don't really get to take a second to show relationships grow.
Its the same for Cap and Tony as other pointed out, there are numerous lines in AoU hardening to time spent running missions together
But I think I would not call the MCU Avengers close enough to be friends. The MCU Guardians of the Galaxy are closer and look after each other better than them.
Steve and Bucky
Steve and Sam
Bucky and Sam (eventually)
Natasha and Clint
Tony and Roddy
Work Friends -
Steve and Tony
"Oh yeah, id kill for all of them, why?"
Only then I realized all we did was make fun of each other.
Bonds and the shit they went through together is probably deeper than just being surface level friendly.
We only see < 10% of what actually happens day to day with these people because we are shown mostly the catastrophic events and extremely high tense situations.
Specifically for Tony and Steve I feel like Tony lwk subtly admired Steve and therefore resented him in certain ways which is why their "break up" arc was like that. Like when Tony said that his dad mentioned Cap a lot. Or how Tony sometimes adapts steves own morals and values into his thought process. In Avengers, Steve basically told Tony he was nothing without the suit. Tony then tells Peter Parker if he is nothing without that suit then he shouldn't have it on. Tony actually does it multiple times where he uses callbacks on things Steve said like his whole rant and breakdown at the beginning of Endgame about how Steve said way back during Ultron they would lose together but Steve wasn't there. Tony probably trusted Steve but not as his "first friend" type of thing. Like there will always be people closer to Tony than steve but there's probably nobody he trusted more than Steve. Tony also uses Steves morals as a shorthand for what's right like with Peter. So when he found out that steve was hiding that from him, that broke the trust. Their relationship wasn't ever best of buds to begin with as they always had different means to reach their goals. But when Tony sort of sees Cap as this moral symbol then finds out he was hiding what Bucky did to his parents, it became this huge betrayal.
That being said, of course Steve was always going to choose Bucky and his best interests. "Saving Bucky" is one of his primary motivations throughout his films, over and above "doing the right thing" or "the greater good." He literally chose to die and let a dangerous, brainwashed HYDRA assassin carry on rather than kill Bucky.
While the MCU definitely could have built up Steve and Tony's relationship more on-screen to make the betrayal more emotionally resonant, I can believe they're friends enough that Tony feels some kind of way about Steve's lie of omission -- it just seems silly to compare in that moment because Steve so dramatically understates what Bucky means to him by just calling him his "friend." That's your ride-or-die soulmate.
I believe it only broke down so badly in Civil War because Thor was their middle ground because he was an Asgardian Prince. By the time he became an Avenger he was wise enough to think about precision and minimizing collateral damage before he acted, which he had in common with Tony; and he was selfless and headstrong enough to put himself in harm’s way to protect others, which he had in common with Captain America.
In the end they realized they completed each other so the world needed both.
where he tells Tony he can't stop because Bucky is his friend. Then Tony replies "So was I"
Tony straight up just admits it.
Let’s be real, the films were trying to convince us that they were like a family.
Um….no
They’d easily risk anything for one another and they have a great deal of respect for one another but they can never really be friends.
I don't vibe with people who claim that Tony and Steve were friends, as in my view they were NEVER friends. But then again, Americans tend to use that word overly much, where they should more appropriately call each other acquaintances instead of 'friends'. So maybe Tony, with his poor interpersonal skills and dysfunctional social experience, **thought** he was friends with Steve, but I don't believe for a moment that Steve ever thought thought he was friends with Tony.