Working Theory for Doomsday

So we all saw Caps baby. Which was in original timeline, Peggy had no baby. We have no implications on the Cap timeline but if he saves Bucky or even if he doesn’t, SHIELD is very much infiltrated in WW2 with Arnim Zola. But Maybe Cap fixed that too. Now with super soldiers being the military’s focus. That leaves Howard Starks company in collapse as super soldiers > military technology. Without Peggy because of baby cap, Howard doesn’t have a co founder. Stark Industries flounders and we have a Howard dying from failure rather than tragedy. Thus a bitter Tony is born. All queued up with a dark build a suit of armor around the world. A failed Stark would be recognizable but not someone with a different. Someone who isn’t a failure. Someone who is a Victor. Mix that in with a their timeline shouldn’t exist and we have an even vengeful Stark. Or maybe I had too many cookies. I dunno.

Voir le contenu lié

Commentaires

SpringMaleficent96992025-12-24 17:39

Peggy has two kids in the original MCU. I’m confused because you make the jump from Cap fixing Hydras infiltration to the military’s focus on super serum and the downfall of the starks. Those two things are separate issues and don’t equate to each other. Just because cap takes down hydra doesn’t mean the military will go all in on the super serum. Even if it did, Starks a genius and was making things outside of the military’s purview (hovering car in Captain America the first avenger for example) so I think that’s kind of a weak argument.

I also personally don’t like the idea of a Tony motivated by revenge. I think a Tony that’s seen the failure of not having “a suit of armor around the world” makes more sense;one that’s tired of the argument of “precious freedoms” and decides he’s doing things his way instead no matter what anyone says. A Tony that you can almost agree with and that will make you walk out of theaters wondering which side was right. That’s the Tony I want to see.