Stupid Thanos
Wasn’t Thanos’ whole thing about decimating half the population of all these planets stupid? Knowing what we know about how fast we on Earth grew from 1 billion to 8 billion, didn’t he realize he’d have to keep snapping every few decades to keep populations in check? 🙄🙄
Commentaires
It's fine to leave it, the MCU loves crapping on the villains afterall, but it really is a disservice to one of the MCU's best villains, he's relegated to a being villain just because.
Thanos' quest was ultimately one of sustainability. Yes, if people didn't learn this lesson and carried on as if nothing happened, they'd repopulate to their pre-snap total relatively quickly, but that's also why snapping more resources would be a terrible idea - exponential growth would lead to the destruction of those resources even quicker.
Here's a thought exercise: As a means of population control, if Earth adopted a one-child policy similar to China (without a culture that made women second-class citizens), think about how that *should* effect how we care about people. Every life becomes necessary. All of a sudden, war is that much more of a terrible idea. Governments should care more about investing in making sure *every* child is well cared for, everything from helping end hunger and disease to trying to make these growing adults are properly educated so they can truly contribute to society.
It's like the same vain of "why doesn't Batman just kill the joker". You have to strip of what makes his character for that to happen.
Using pretty much the same example; heros with no kill rules. They know the villain will get out of prison but they feel they did the right thing, even if the villain gets out and kills again they refuse to change their core beliefs/concepts.
I get your point but this is my thought process towards that.
there is a lesson there
to assume it would be completely ignored is, weird.
Ten years of teasing for a motivation that doesn't really hold up or fit in with any good development that came before (I understand the parallel with Tony, but at least with him we saw good reasons for him to have bad ideas)
And when we explain "he's mad," I think the simp death motivation is much better on paper