Captain america brave new world could have so easily been a good movie with a couple changes
First of all sam should take the serum. There's literally no negative consequences in taking the serum and considering the fact that he's about to be leading the charge against doom while being a regular human just because of his principles makes him seem like a snob not brave. Enough about that. Here's the biggest change i would make. PUT BRUCE BANNER IN THE MOVIE. Seriously i don't get how the people in charge didn't put hulk in basically a hulk movie (this movie is definitely kind of a sequel to the incredible hulk). This way we could have both gotten the savage hulk back and had a final fight that's believable instead of having sam the human stop a hulk punch with his bare hands. The way i would have envisioned is that seeing the man who hunted him his entire adult life turn into the same exact monster he is would have triggered bruce to the point of the savage hulk re-emerging which would have then lead to an epic fight with 2 hulks. Also this is a much more complex subject but i would have preferred the leader to not just be a walking plot device who appears and disappears conveniently when the story requires
Commentaires
They only used Sterns because of his ties to Ross. Sterns wouldn't be in the movie if Ross wasn't.
To the extent that Brave New World has a theme, it's "might versus right"; the way that power and morality interact with each other. Sam's super power, going right back to the first time we meet him in Winter Solider, is his empathy. He was a counsellor, and understands the emotional and psychological toll of conflict.
In Falcon and the Winter Soldier, we get a lot of backstory on how Sam perceives the interaction of physical power and insitutional power. We see this in microcosm when he applies for a mortgage and is told that, for all his superheroism and saving the universe, he still can't do anything about a bank refusing his request for a loan.
However, it's Sam's experiences with Isiah Bradley that ultimately convince him not to take the serum, because this reinforces the way that physical power can make you into a commodity, and does nothing to empower you against institutional power. Isiah is a victim because he is given physical power but deprived of freedom by the state; he has no choice in how he wields his strength for good, and ends up bitter and forgotten.
Clunky though it is, Sam's final speech to the government at the end of Falcon at the Winter Soldier is the natural end-point of this story; remaining a "normal" human but speaking truth to power and guiding them to become better (this is the idea; I get why people feel this didn't work in execution).
All of this reinforces Sam's belief is that he can do more to inspire the average person by being the "everyman" Captain America.
Brave New World squanders this thematic clarity by having Sam basically be as physically durable as any superhuman because the plot requires it. He is stabbed at one point, and just pretty much gets better straight away. He goes toe-to-toe with a Hulk, takes a few hits and basically ends up OK. If the story had emphasised the danger of even small physical injuries, or had a greater focus on Sam working hard not to get hit (because one hit from a Hulk to a normal person ought to be instant death), there would be greater thematic cohesion and narrative stakes. Oh well.
So I guess what I'm saying is... for all that they ended up doing with this storyline, they may as well have let Sam have the serum because he basically acts like he's taken it anyway. However, I do believe that Brave New World could have carried forward some of the strong themes of FATWS if they'd chosen to, and it would have been a more interesting film for it.
The point isn’t that the super serum would make Sam into a bad person, or that there’s some darkness in him that would make him corrupt if he took the serum.
The point is that Sam’s arc through FATWS is him realising that *even if* he was a good person and stayed a good person, becoming more physically powerful would make him more of a target to be weaponised by institutional power. We know this because even Steve Rogers was successfully weaponised this way, during the events of Civil War.
I don’t really think your point about leading against Dr Doom holds water because a) we don’t actually know what the shape of that story is going to be yet and b) there are more than enough superhuman folks knocking about who can be the “muscle”.
In order to be a leader Sam doesn’t need to be the most physically powerful, and that is the absolute *thematic core* of Sam’s arc.
The best thing about marvel is when their characters are the underdogs that have to develop and grow to win.
When they just hand them overwhelming power they didn't build, the movie sucks.
It's not the way the thanos beat the hulk.
Also, That scene wasn't about Ross "Caring about Sam", it was about his Daughter and Ross trying to be a better person for her.
*Or experience consequences for not doing so*.
Imagine how fucking hard, how fucking *holy shit, this* **is** *the right man for the job* if after losing an arm (and fostering an introduction to Misty Knight, and further cementing Sam Wilson's role as a veteran who works with vets) he stood by his decision *not* to take the serum.
Its easy to make the *right choice*, when there are no downstream consequences.
Leader - Hulk - Redhulk- Sam = made perfect Breave new world film.