What's the current Sony-Disney Deal? Should Marvel start downplaying Spider-Man?
What's the current deal that we know between Sony and Disney in regards to Spider-Man?
Last I heard - which was after NWH, is that the deal was one Sony SM Movie and using Spider-Man in 1 more Avengers Movie.
Is that still the case? Tom Holland has spoke about the new SM Movie being like a "passing of the torch" - which I assume means Miles.
I dunno if I'm Marvel, I might reconsider putting so much focus on Spider-Man due to the Deal being able to end. Like the Deal ended before when Disney got greedy but they made up.
Sony has a problem with their SM Movies (without Spider-Man) and obviously Garfield's SM Movies were very disliked (but now revisionised as being liked)
Maybe Marvel should cut Spider-Man out post Secret Wars
Last I heard - which was after NWH, is that the deal was one Sony SM Movie and using Spider-Man in 1 more Avengers Movie.
Is that still the case? Tom Holland has spoke about the new SM Movie being like a "passing of the torch" - which I assume means Miles.
I dunno if I'm Marvel, I might reconsider putting so much focus on Spider-Man due to the Deal being able to end. Like the Deal ended before when Disney got greedy but they made up.
Sony has a problem with their SM Movies (without Spider-Man) and obviously Garfield's SM Movies were very disliked (but now revisionised as being liked)
Maybe Marvel should cut Spider-Man out post Secret Wars
Commentaires
However, you got some facts wrong. First of all, that's more of an opinion, but Disney didn't get greedy when they asked for more money, the original deal was very unfavorable to them. Marvel Studios was about to make one of the biggest movies ever with No Way Home and Disney would barely get anything from it.
But more importantly, Tom never described the next movie as a passing of torch.
Also, only the second Garfield movie was disliked, the first one was liked and even considered an improvement over Spider-Man 3.
Disney/Marvel need to work with Sony to keep Spider-Man in the MCU. Both studios will suffer is SM goes to Sony-only.
Spider man being made with marvels influence makes money.
Sony has to keep making movies using the property or they lose the property.
The majority of the Sony led marvel movies have been shit shows.
For marvel Spiderman bridges a lot of characters together.
Its financially beneficial for both companies to keep the deal going.
Whenever possible because they are large companies they will posture to get a better cut of the deal.
Part of the posturing involves making the claim they are okay walking away.
The only thing in question really is are they willing to keep increasing Tom Hollands pay to keep him as Spiderman or are they okay with using one of the many methods that are storyline built in already to replace him with a different cheaper actor to continue using some version of Spiderman.
F4 barely cleared 500 mil. Shang Chi and Captain Sam limped past 400 mil. Yelena and The T-Bolts couldn't clear 400 mil. Eternals and Marvels....