Why did Tony never even attempt to look for Bruce?
I never really gave any thought to it, but after watching Infinity War again, and hearing Tony say that him and Bruce haven't caught up in a while, I can't stop thinking about how odd it is, that Tony never even tried to find Bruce after the events of Ultron.
I personally don't like the idea that the Avengers aren't all family, or that some dynamics in the team stronger than another, bc that should be the entire point of a team, but it's especially weird considering that at the point of Ultron, the Avenger Tony has the strongest dynamic with is actually Bruce, not even Cap really. He gets along with him immediately, treats him like regular person and engages him in intellectual dialogue, and I believe even hires him to work for his company in the first movie. By the end of Iron Man 3, we learn that he is so close to Bruce, that he uses him like his therapist to address his existential issues, and then by Ultron, we learn that Tony not only trusted him to help him develop Ultron in the first place, but Bruce was close enough with Tony to trust him to develop a weapon that could rival the Hulk.
So why then when Bruce goes radio silent and jets away, the only person on the entire team who gave af that one core member of the team was gone, wasn't the leader Cap, wasn't his punching buddy Thor, and or his intellectual buddy Tony, it was Natasha! I understand they had a lil romance, i'm not bothered by her being sorta worried about him, but i thought it was really dumb that Tony never even tried to look for who was for all intents x purposes, his best friend on the team.
I personally don't like the idea that the Avengers aren't all family, or that some dynamics in the team stronger than another, bc that should be the entire point of a team, but it's especially weird considering that at the point of Ultron, the Avenger Tony has the strongest dynamic with is actually Bruce, not even Cap really. He gets along with him immediately, treats him like regular person and engages him in intellectual dialogue, and I believe even hires him to work for his company in the first movie. By the end of Iron Man 3, we learn that he is so close to Bruce, that he uses him like his therapist to address his existential issues, and then by Ultron, we learn that Tony not only trusted him to help him develop Ultron in the first place, but Bruce was close enough with Tony to trust him to develop a weapon that could rival the Hulk.
So why then when Bruce goes radio silent and jets away, the only person on the entire team who gave af that one core member of the team was gone, wasn't the leader Cap, wasn't his punching buddy Thor, and or his intellectual buddy Tony, it was Natasha! I understand they had a lil romance, i'm not bothered by her being sorta worried about him, but i thought it was really dumb that Tony never even tried to look for who was for all intents x purposes, his best friend on the team.
Commentaires
Also on another note, they are a family, OP. Natasha makes a point of that multiple times in Black Widow.
B) I always assumed that they understood he wanted to be alone and let him.
MCU Stark is possibly the biggest improvement over the comics other than the way they cut out his alcoholism journey and how he went public with that information as a way to show that heroes should be accountable to the public and not untouchable gods.
So Disney only agreed to alcoholic Tony Stony in the MCU as long as he was a closet alcoholic never revealing his alcoholism to the public.
That's pretty messed up for Disney to do that.
That's the same comic that has Thor absolutely shitstomp Tony with zero effort and rip off his mask with one hand like it's wet tissue paper, right?
Pooping however, not sure.
If a combat F-35 turned off its transponder, we for the most part wouldn’t be able to track it, we’d just get occasional mach-1 bees showing up for a second or two on radar. And those aren’t magical Quinjets
You know what else was over once the mission was over? The movie. We don't see what Tony did after that movie ended. And really, a city was lifted into the air and almost dropped onto the people below. And a large amount of shit *was* dropped on them. There's going to be a LOT of injured people buried under rubble. If Tony decided to run off looking for Bruce (a man who didn't *want* to be found) a lot more innocent people would have died than already had.
I'd also like to assume that the Avengers helped carry out search and rescue even though none of the movies even hinted that they did that. Because they'd be fucking evil monsters if they didn't help the people they directly hurt. And with their powers it would be a hell of a lot easier for them to rescue those people.
So no, movies don't need to explicitly state what characters have done after the movie ended. Audiences should use their brain and common sense to help bridge the gap sometimes. It's in character for them to help out after the battle. And it's in character for them to have searched for Bruce.
There were much more important things that we needed to be shown.
So they really don't have time to put unnecessary lines in the movie like that.
Got it.

How is it that you can assume Tony gave Bruce a job even though that isn’t shown anywhere and yet you can’t assume that the Avengers were missing Banner?
I guarantee that if Tony or Cap were ever declared missing from the group, there would've been a consensus on screen to find them. I mean Captain Marvel shows up at the end of her movie, and the teams immediate thought, is not to have her find the Thanos, not to find the guantlet, but to have her go look through the vastness of space to find Tony who was declared MIA.
What is shown in the movie is what the directors want us to see to establish feelings or set up the next movies. So yes, there was more emotion put into Tony’s and Natasha’s deaths and Steve’s choice to go back in time. Because they wanted to set up emotional feels in the audience.
Bruce’s disappearance was never that way. The Hulk and Bruce are not as beloved as the other characters. His disappearance wasn’t going to have the same impact on the audience or the other characters.
Again, it’s shown that Tony had Friday looking for Bruce. He obviously cared. Steve talks to Natasha about the situation. So he obviously cared. We can assume that the other characters cared about Bruce too. But because of the Hulk, they did have mixed feelings.
Hulk is a huge asset but also a huge liability as is shown in the comics and the movies. He can’t be controlled, only aimed. They had to create a psychological trigger and tie it to Nat so they could turn him back into Bruce. And Hulk resented it. They created an entire suit to fight him in case he went on a rampage. So while they miss Bruce, they don’t miss the risk of the Hulk.
Audiences also don’t care about the Hulk as much. The Incredible Hulk came out six weeks after Ironman and when summer had actually started. Yet it grossed less than half of what Ironman did. Why? There are a lot of people who are triggered by angry men.
So yes, they missed Bruce. Yes, Nat missed him most due to a budding romance. They did try looking for him. They were also busy at the time getting Avengers compound up and running and doing cleanup post Sokovia.
The directors also wanted to make the feelings of people in universe clear. The Hulk was a useful tool but a huge liability. This is why we didn’t see more mourning for Bruce in the movie.
Kind of a strange post haha
I had the same issue with the end of captain america. I don't quite buy Stark would have abandoned the search for steve in the ocean.
Where did you get that?
But there was?
Go re watch the end of Ultron. Widow and Fury literally discuss as well.
>"because some people thinks he would do so" isn't proof.. It's also such crap storytelling that it pretty much isn't storytelling..
20+years of the MCU, character act is storytelling. Knowing Tony's character, you really think you just okay never mind?
Yeah, they mentioned that he swam to Fiji and didn't want to be disturbed.. Still doesn't make it unreasonable to want to see or hear a mention of Tony actually pitching in somehow..
\>20+years of the MCU, character act is storytelling. Knowing Tony's character, you really think you just okay never mind?
I never said Never Mind anything.. I even agree that, by rights, he probably would turn the world inside out looking for Banner... But unless they make mention of something somewhere then it's borderline nonsensical to assume that it happened off screen.. Otherwise we could all collectively agree that Green Goblin spent most evenings before being pulled into the MCU in No Way Home dressing in drag and drowning kittens for jollies..
They mention Tony's tech and mention that they are looking.
>Otherwise we could all collectively agree that Green Goblin spent most evenings before being pulled into the MCU in No Way Home dressing in drag and drowning kittens for jollies..
Again. Character. It makes sense for Tony to keep looking. Why would Norman do that in character?
Actually speaking of character why am I even arguing with you you made up your mind by not paying attention and being upset that they don't show every single little detail
I guess no one shits in the MCU. Pissing though, Clint takes a piss in Hawkeye! In case you needed to know that happens. Jfc
We may as well assume that Iron Man spent a week doing strafing runs on the refugee camps we saw in Iron Man 1, to international acclaim and applause, because how do you know he didn’t?.. .. Assuming that something happens in universe with no proof is nonsense..
I swear I dont get how some people come up with their takes.
We may as well assume that Iron Man spent a week doing strafing runs on the refugee camps we saw in Iron Man 1, to international acclaim and applause, because how do you know he didn’t?.. .. Assuming that something happens in universe with no proof is nonsense..
Post Civil War, Tony had bigger issues. Tony probably looked for Bruce but didn't devote all his resources to it for a bunch of very good reasons
1.) He didn't really trust anyone after how he felt Cap & Nat betrayed him, how Vision caused Rhodey's accident. Zemo Played him & made him angry at everyone.
2. He just had the team break up & he had nobody else on it. Everyone on his side left or was out of commission. Nat left, T'Challa went back to Wakanda, Vision was seeing Wanda on the side, Rhodey was paralyzed. There was no Avengers.
3. He respected Bruce's need to be left alone after what happened in Africa. He knew Bruce knew how to stay off the radar.
4. Finding Bruce would have probably ment that he would have ended up in the Raft or worse. The accords were still very much a thing especially with Ross in charge. If you think Ross wouldn't have buried Bruce in the darkest hole & used him as a guinea pig after it's shown how much he HATES Bruce. Tony not finding Bruce kept him out of prison.
2. For better or worse, the best friend side of Tony that Banner had was almost gone cause of his PTSD and his fear of Thanos. In all honesty, they were really only "Best Friends" for Avengers 2012 and maybe you can say Infinity War when Tony finally got his head out of his ass. Again, Tony is one of the few characters who has like 3 or 4 different personalities lol.