I have to admit that my hype for this film exceeds that of Infinity War, and that was already very high. I can't wait to see Doom.
ProductArizona2025-11-03 15:14
You're joking 🙃
Johnny02302025-11-03 15:19
if Endgame had come out today...
FrishFrash2025-11-03 15:20
Why???
Johnny02302025-11-03 15:58
Because I like the more fantasy-like setting of the saga and the heroes involved (Thunderbolts, Loki, Fantastic Four etc.), as well as the introduction of my favorite Marvel comics villain.
Jigglepirate2025-11-03 15:22
This is the one reddit comment that Marvel Executives will see and use to rationalize all their botched decisions since Endgame.
Johnny02302025-11-03 15:57
Ok
Linnus422025-11-03 15:33
Why? Infinity War has good build up and popular heroes.
This has poor build up and heroes that struggle to crack 400 mil much less 500 mil.
Johnny02302025-11-03 15:57
In Infinity War and Endgame, every character has their own preparation. What do the box office have to do with it? Endgame's $3 billion gross proves that the film is being watched even by those who haven't followed the entire saga, given the enormous difference in results.
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 16:28
I think he's referring to popularity with box office returns.
Johnny02302025-11-03 16:35
Me too. Endgame (or Deadpool, NWH, Strange 2 etc) was watched by people who never followed the MCU.
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 16:45
Yes but he's comparing the popularity of heroes who led Endgame with the popularity of those who are leading Doomsday.
Linnus422025-11-03 17:01
Indeed outside of Thor none of these confirmed heroes have proven popularity. Which is probably why they are leading hard into RDJ Doom.
FirewaterTenacious2025-11-03 16:20
Box office isn’t the same post Covid. Disney doesn’t have the Chinese market anymore like they did for phases 1-3. Plus inflation hamstrings people’s ability to buy tickets. And there’s Disney+ for streaming if people are patient. Phase 4-6 are hitting theaters during a different time period where you can’t really compare box office numbers. If you look at movie sales plus week one D+ streaming numbers, the “views” are comparable to phase 1-3. Do people pay for D+ specifically for MCU, though? Does that count as box office numbers? No. But there is some metric there that Disney is aware of. My point is box office numbers don’t have anything to do with it anymore. It’s impossible to compare.
MarvelsGrantMan1362025-11-03 15:11
Simu:
>”Yeah, three: dream come true."
>”I mean, there are just so many actors in it, and getting to work with those people as peers is really incredible because I grew up watching so many of them. It feels, in a lot of ways, like a love letter to the entire genre of superhero movies. And I think there’s something really fun about that."
>”For all the misfits and the weirdos and the underdogs that grew up reading comic books and feeling like there was hope for them somehow – that it didn’t matter if they didn’t fit in – I think there’s just always a special place in my heart for that entire genre."
igby12025-11-03 15:25
For all the misfits that never thought they’d fit in - you were right. But make sure you see Doomsday on the biggest screen possible!
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:14
honestly at this point, those "misfits" are all in their fifties. When I was growing up, comic books were niche but not "misfit"; Spider-Man was the biggest movie at the box office.
If you are twenty year old boy watching Doomsday--the target audience for that movie--the first Avengers movie came out when you were seven and became the most successful non-James Cameron movie ever. I don't think its a misfit thing anymore.
justbeane2025-11-03 17:36
> honestly at this point, those "misfits" are all in their fifties. When I was growing up, comic books were niche but not "misfit"; Spider-Man was the biggest movie at the box office.
Excuse me... I was very much one of those misfits when I was collecting comics in the mid-90s. I am in my mid-40s now.
Bpste12025-11-03 23:07
Sorry to tell you that mid-40’s isnt too different from 50’s
ggg7302025-11-04 02:46
SHUT IT UP YOU!
Empty-Afternoon-39752025-11-04 15:37
Mooooooom, grandpa's yelling at his phone again
justbeane2025-11-04 02:46
Ouch.
igby12025-11-04 05:59
Yeah 50s are like 40s except *everything is worse*.
FictionFantom2025-11-03 18:12
It’s not niche to go see Marvel movies but when you’re still reading comics, collecting figures, cosplaying, making art, writing fanfic, etc. then you wind up back in misfit territory.
EfficiencyPersonal752025-11-03 17:40
its awesome how he connects with the underdog vibe, totally resonates with so many of us
Longjumping_Age_96172025-11-03 18:06
that really hits home, its cool to see some love for the underdogs
More_Monitor78832025-11-03 18:14
totally get that, those stories mean a lot to a lot of us who felt out of place
Bruhmangoddman2025-11-03 15:15
I'm so fucking sick of slapping the "homage" or "love letter" label on movies pre-release (hell, even post-release!) by its creators and fans alike. It doesn't really tell anything. Instead you can tease (or simply say if it's post-release) that it's emotional, thematically resonant, high on high octane action, immersive, whatnot... But not THIS.
enbiien2025-11-03 15:17
Literally like what happens if supposed ‘love letter’ mishandles every character and they all suck? It’s not a love letter anymore is it
mayhemtime2025-11-03 15:27
Throwback to Star Wars episode 9 that they said had a script that was "every fan's dream"
Heisenburgo2025-11-03 15:51
Throwback to that movie's plot being leaked in goddamn BURGER KING of all places, with fans saying it could not possibly be real since it sounded god-awful but then it ended up being the real deal lol
enbiien2025-11-03 16:19
that’s how star wars is now. new content? no. darth vader again and you will like it. (and a lot of them do)
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:43
Kenobi was so frustrating because it was like so great watching Hayden Christensen come back and seeing the fandom that once was super shitty to him welcome him back with open arms, only to then be shitty to Moses Ingram, because on a fundamental level cyberbullying new actors is just part of Star Wars fan culture.
PayneTrain1819992025-11-03 15:18
These buzz words generate discussion from fans and sceptics alike, that’s why they use them in headlines, to get clicks and exposure.
AntonioWilde2025-11-03 15:34
I completely agree. The term "love letter" makes my eyes roll.
MIAxPaperPlanes2025-11-03 15:49
Love letter is just code for “nostalgia bait” at this point.
Hey look we got all the spidermen and X-men you grew up with over the last 20 years!
Bruhmangoddman2025-11-03 15:51
"Oh, but what will we do with them, we hear you say? MATTERS NOT! They're here! Be HAPPY! GIVE US YOUR MONEH!"
ProductArizona2025-11-03 16:02
Incoming cameo fest and ANOTHER tribute to the fox universe....
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 16:29
This post is a love letter to everyone who is fed up with the overuse of the phrase "love letter".
PayneTrain1819992025-11-03 15:16
I’m so glad that Shang-Chi was one of the characters they confirmed for this movie right away, it’s almost like they knew they had to reassure us he’s actually coming back this time.
Hopefully they give him some great stuff in the movie, I’m hoping for him and Gambit to have a fight where they’re throwing rings and cards at each other.
demonoddy2025-11-03 15:28
Judging by the marvel zombies show i think he will be the comedic relief
bchec2025-11-03 15:46
I wouldn’t go off of what’s essentially a What If…? series for how a character is going to be written in film.
demonoddy2025-11-03 15:59
I’m not but I think they will lean into him being funny like antman
CeruleanEidolon2025-11-03 16:37
It's a solid bet with RDJ behind the mask. A solemn humorless RDJ isn't something audiences want, is it?
demonoddy2025-11-03 16:48
Yeah I don’t want doom to be funny though
TunakTun6332025-11-03 19:17
You're right, there's *no* way we can imagine RDJ being fun while wearing a mask.
YourInMySwamp2025-11-03 19:33
They’re talking about Shang Chi.
Heisenburgo2025-11-03 15:49
> he will be the comedic relief
That's nothing special considering that's probably an apt description for like, 80% of all Marvel protagonists nowadays...
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 16:04
At this point in the MCU there's at worst a 50/50 chance that Doom's suit will be a hot dog costume.
Jabberwocky4162025-11-03 18:54
Superhero costumes recently have been getting much MORE comic accurate, not less.
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:16
I mean let's be honest, most of them are going to be comic relief.
Nobody whose last name isn't "Richards", and who doesn't already have a close enough relationship with Tony Stark to be freaked out that he's evil now, is going to have a personal reason for opposing Doom. I genuinely can't imagine what most of the characters' arcs are going to be in the movie.
demonoddy2025-11-03 17:33
Okay
YourInMySwamp2025-11-03 19:34
Who in Infinity War had a close relationship with Thanos? Nobody. Tony was the only person on Earth who even had knowledge of his existence.
Eric_T_Meraki2025-11-03 15:49
Doom might have the 10 rings so I imagine he'll connect that somehow.
CeruleanEidolon2025-11-03 16:36
If they were smart they would follow this up with *Shang-Chi 2*.
PayneTrain1819992025-11-03 17:02
Apparently that’s been in development for years but obviously keeps getting pushed back.
elpajaroquemamais2025-11-03 17:30
Waiting to reveal iron fist in daredevil first
Impressive-Potato2025-11-03 21:24
EW
WheedMBoise2025-11-03 23:10
I mean, the bar is on the floor with how rough the Netflix show went. Iron Fist could be a prime candidate for an actually successful MCU cleanup - reboot
Spacegirllll62025-11-03 20:20
Yeah hopefully Simu Liu has recovered fully. I heard he like tore his Achilles and had to have surgery. Recovery for that shit takes a while and it’s common to have some residual loss of function and strength for almost 2 years after
CaptHayfever2025-11-03 20:35
Yep. Partially due to delays on other projects, partially due to Liu's injuries, & partially due to Cretton's other work. I expect it to enter full-speed pre-production after Spidey 4 is finished.
Impressive-Potato2025-11-03 21:25
Supposed to start after the Wonderman show but Marvel took the director and put him on Spider-Man instead,
22LOVESBALL2025-11-03 15:16
I am 100% certain that I will enjoy this movie.
LongOdd15962025-11-03 15:25
I'm cautiously optimistic.
Here's hoping Doomsday won't be a messy cameo galore where fan service takes front seat and plot is an afterthought. Fingers crossed!
SpeedForce20222025-11-03 15:27
Tbh I don’t think that any of the announced characters will be cameos, I think they’re all main cast
demonoddy2025-11-03 15:29
When have the russos ever done that ?
LongOdd15962025-11-03 15:33
That's why I'm optimistic.
demonoddy2025-11-03 15:59
Exactly ! They lock in for marvel. I don’t care about their other movies
LADYBIRD_HILL2025-11-03 17:05
They haven't, but all their movies after endgame have sucked even when reuniting with MCU cast members.
demonoddy2025-11-03 17:34
I mean they directed community before marvel so it’s not like they were doing art house films or anything. I think they just work extremely well in the marvel system
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:20
I kind of can't see what the alternative is.
I could tell you a solid year out of IW what Thanos' arrival would mean for Tony (would have to face his fears), Steve (would be faced with a threat he couldn't "optimism and teamwork" his way out of), Gamora (has to confront her dad), Vision (is going to be targeted because of the thing in his head) and T'Challa (is going to have to put his nation on the frontline, since he promised Killmonger he'd do more to protect the whole world).
I couldn't tell you what Shang-Chi and Sam Wilson and Suri and Yelena have to do with Dr. Doom; like what their emotional connection to him is.
demonoddy2025-11-03 17:27
It’s not about emotional connection. The whole multiverse is going to collapse. I think the fantastic 4 and maybe the X-men will know of doom though
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:30
Hard disagree. Good stories need emotional stakes. Infinity War had emotional stakes, it didn't just go "Thanos is gonna get the rocks and do something bad, somebody stop him!"
"The whole multiverse is going to collapse" what does that even mean? Why should I care?
I'm sure if it's written well, they'll come up with a way to make me care, I guess, but I can't see how like half of these characters will fit into it.
demonoddy2025-11-03 17:32
They fit into because if they don’t fight the entire multiverse is gone. That means everyone dies period.
22LOVESBALL2025-11-03 17:37
But that’s what the movie is for, to create emotional stakes. Things will happen in this movie to create that, we don’t need to know beforehand
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:38
That is true, and this is probably the best answer to my gripe lol
But it also means I don't really have anything to get hyped for in the way I was hyped for the others. I honestly think if they had a movie like Avengers 1 where a bunch of the new characters to come together to fight one villain, I'd be more excited.
22LOVESBALL2025-11-03 15:43
Yeah but even if it is all fan service I’ll still enjoy it. I love seeing all the characters pop up
tyrwlive2025-11-03 15:49
I thoroughly trust the Russo brothers. The same writers who worked on TWS are also involved.. I have high hopes!
pedroktp2025-11-03 17:48
Just one of them came back tho
Temporary_Draft_66122025-11-04 05:02
and they are coming off of The Electric State
MishellyUser2025-11-07 18:17
I'm cautiously optimistic, but getting my fists ready to judge it fairly and curb stomp some grifters
demonoddy2025-11-03 15:29
I think people are going to be blown away
CeruleanEidolon2025-11-03 16:39
I think it's going to be great, and people who love Marvel movies will love it, but the Internet will turn on it over the most trivial nonsense and "critical consensus" will call it "middling" and say dismissive stuff like "it's no Endgame".
I'm already girding myself for that and preparing to ignore all of it, because that's just how the culture works now. Like what you like, let people like stuff, and if it's not your bag move on.
demonoddy2025-11-03 16:49
Yeah I agree 100%. I think it will be similar to no way home reception. People will love it and it will do very well but then they will pick it apart in the coming months. I think marvel has to have a couple years of consistent hits before people shut up
Odd_Relief10692025-11-03 16:06
Me too!
SorryRoof16532025-11-03 15:17
I know most people online want to clown on Doomsday, but seeing that Marvel realizes that this and Spider-man are their only lifelines, it really seems like they're actually putting effort into this film and are really trying to make this work. I, for one, am really excited to see all my favorite characters, old and new, come together to fight one of the most iconic comic-book villains of all time.
More than a year away but we're already building hype.
December 2026, here we come!
electrorazor2025-11-03 15:38
I definitely feel the same way. The question for me is if there even is a way to make this work.
Heart-Lights4202025-11-03 16:14
Well… we have Avenger Infinity War and Endgame; as well as Spiderman No Way Home and Deadpool & Wolverine… they were complex, with bunch of actors in it, well though thru, and generally speaking, people liked these movies a lot. Additionally, the last 2 movies, Thunderbolts and Fantastic 4, were well received as well. So they have good examples of what we like and what seems to work.
I don’t want to get super confident we will get the best movie ever… but MCU really needs this movie to work, so I’m confident they will try their best to make a quality movie.
electrorazor2025-11-03 16:18
None of those come remotely close to what Doomsday is trying to accomplish here.
Heart-Lights4202025-11-03 16:55
You are right man, and I’m not disagreeing with you. We shall see how they manage 🤞
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 16:11
I'm hopeful but I feel like putting real effort into this would be doing what they did with Thanos and the Infinity Saga where they built up to the events over the course of 18 previous movies. Instead, it looks like everything is just being shoehorned into one movie. It's hard to imagine that the plot will be much of a factor with a cast this large.
The Multiverse Saga just didn't have the same planning and attention to detail that the Infinity Saga did but it feels the whole thing went off the rails the moment Majors was arrested.
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:46
Yeah, I don't think they're putting the right kind of effort in.
It *really* feels like Disney, Marvel et. al have been trying to speedrun a new IW/Endgame because they want that again, only someone explained to them that "IW/E only happened after thirty movies of build up" so they went "ok, so have thirty movies and shows come out over the course of three years, is that enough build up? It better be!"
Like, I know IW was like "the big Marvel movie", but it was also still Avengers 3. Like--it's the second sequel to Avengers 1. It exists because there was an Avengers 1, and it continues the plot and character arcs from that movie. **We needed a new Avengers 1, not a new Avengers 3, and we never got it**.
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 18:56
> We needed a new Avengers 1, not a new Avengers 3, and we never got it.
You're 100% right but I would take that a bit further and say we needed buildup to a new Avengers 1.
I mean that first movie didn't just come out of nowhere. The MCU introduced the characters but they also introduced the Avengers Initiative, Nick Fury, Shield, etc. and actively recruited Iron Man on screen which all led to The Avengers and it all made sense. I don't even know who The Avengers are anymore. Fury, Black Widow, Rodgers, and Stark are all gone. Jeremy Renner and Mark Ruffalo don't appear to be in the cast so Hawkeye and Hulk are someplace else.
"Who even are The Avengers at this point?" is a question that should have been answered before the next Avengers movie.
But you're right. We should have a new Avengers 1 that shows the dynamic of the New Avengers working together for the first time like with the original Avengers.
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 19:54
Honestly, if it was up to me, I would have made make Khamar-Taj the new SHIELD.
I think the mythology around that is cool, I think Stephen Strange was a prime candidate to be front-and-center (esp. after people got weird about Brie and Chadwick dying), but it need to be a Nick Fury esque role since he's not really an Avenger. The New York Sanctum could become Avengers Mansion. Instead of building up to a "Thanos", they build up to a "Loki" (should have been Wanda, the original script for Dr. Strange 2 has her surviving, and only turning bad at the very end).
Then it's just a matter of assembling a few heroes (*a few! Again its Avengers 1 not Infinity War!*) and having them get cranky with each other.
All of that buildup was there if they wanted to capitalize on it, but instead they kept building a bunch of other things, and then selling us on Kang, and oh by the way all the buildup they were doing has nothing to even do with Kang and now even less to do with Doom. Its so weird.
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 20:38
In their defense, the Multiverse Saga was blindsided by Jonthan Majors hitting his girlfriend.
It was going poorly up to that point but, once that happened, the MCU really had to pivot.
I think where they went wrong was the introduction of new characters in Phase 4. They should have been more focused on dealing with the fallout of the blip and what comes next. I mean half of the world disappeared in IW and it's *barely* ever mentioned again. The world should have been in absolute chaos and storylines should have revolved around restoring order. Villains don't have to keep getting bigger and badder. Sometimes the villain just has to be a rouge nation trying to create super soldiers or whatever.
Phase 5 should have been building up to a city level event which culminated in the old Avengers passing the torch to new Avengers in a new Avengers 1.
Phase 6 should have been building up to planetary level event which culminated in a new Avengers 2.
And, while all that's going on, we see hints of Phase 7 and the multiversal threat or whatever.
Then start the cycle all over again.
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 20:42
Yeah, makes sense.
And I understand the thing with Jonathan Majors, but I also think they really shouldn't have been putting that many eggs in that basket.
They were so interested in building characters in Phase 4; but they had so many characters already in the tank! I really think they could have just moved forward with Parker, Strange, T'Challa and Danvers, but Brie Larson made people mad I guess and T'Challa's actor died and Parker's actor works with a different production company, and that *just* leaves Strange (who I think is asking for more money now).
swissarmychris2025-11-03 16:35
My biggest worry is that this is *such* an important movie for the franchise and brand that the executives will not be able to stop themselves from meddling, and drive the whole thing into a focus-tested ditch.
But the Russos have proven they can pull off a massive movie like this, so I'll put my faith in them and hope for the best.
capeasypants2025-11-03 17:54
You're correct. That's why the first step was to make sure they had a rock solid script before making any announcements, etc
CaptHayfever2025-11-03 20:40
People overlook how effective of a rebuilding slate the 2025 films were:
* First, Brave New World showed they could get the budgets back down again.
* Next, Thunderbolts showed they could get the quality back again even on a lower budget.
* Then, First Steps showed they could get back to profitability again, without sacrificing the quality *or* jacking up the budget too much.
With the groundwork now laid for improved public perception, 2026 will be a one-two punch of Spider-Man & Avengers to finish the job of winning the GA back.
JiangWei232025-11-04 00:03
Good point, and I'm optimistic that they can deliver a great experience with the two movies, but the real question is do they have a plan for afterwards. Infinity War/Endgame was also a fantastic one-two punch that rewarded MCU fans for keeping up, but was also approachable enough that general audiences were able to dive in and enjoy it without knowing too much about the MCU ("He's from space. He came here to steal a necklace from a wizard.")
...and then all the goodwill they had from those movies kind of fizzled out when the audience (MCU or not) realized there wasn't really a plan for afterwards. It *felt* like (not saying it's true) they kept introducing new heroes with minimal crossover. Phase 4/5 came and went with a bunch of new heroes introduced or sequels to heroes, but no Avengers movie to tie them all together and make it feel coherent.
So my hope is that these two Avengers movies are able to reignite people's excitement and bring them in, and then *keep* that momentum going with a coherent, actual plan that isn't too much all at once. You can just recreate the Phase 1-3 formula of 3 central characters (Iron Man, Cap, and Thor) that get a movie every phase or so along with new heroes, and every phase is capped off with an Avengers movie.
The general audience won't always keep up with every new Marvel flick, but the Avengers name still has enough power to draw them in. Here's to hoping the lessons they learned from 2025 carry over into the new phase, it can only mean good things for the fans.
CaptHayfever2025-11-04 00:13
I think the plan for 2027 is to let things breathe to address the oversaturation complaints, & then deliver another banger Avengers film to round out the saga. Then we already know they want to start focusing on mutants in the next saga.
roninshere4eva2025-11-03 15:20
Doomsday feels like such a conundrum
Endgam2025-11-03 16:36
It really does.
I'm actually looking forward to the second seasons of X-Men 97, YFNSM, and Daredevil Born Again more than I am Doomsday.
Yes everyone loves to point out how Infinity War pulled it off, but try rewatching it. Most of the non-Thanos scenes move at a pretty rapid pace specifically so they can give Thanos room to breathe. Which works because all the other characters and the current state of things are established leading into Infinity War.
.....Now consider that we have even more characters this time, many which haven't met each other (DESPITE all the shows which really just introduced a bunch of new characters most of which aren't even announced for the film), the Fox X-Men characters which will basically be new versions albeit played by the same actors), and while juggling all these characters they have to set up **Doctor Fucking Doom**. A character arguably just as iconic to the Marvel brand as Spider-Man. A character fans have waited decades to see be finally portrayed properly. A character..... who in his first scene we've gotten he's already showing his face to someone when Doom never shows his face to anyone. *He even tries to avoid looking at it himself.*
*.....Yeah.*
AsteroidMike2025-11-03 15:27
I was gonna show up and get tickets for opening day regardless, so there’s no concern from me not showing up. I get there’s questions about the buildup to this movie but I’m hyped all the way.
knotsteve2025-11-03 15:29
I realize this is the Marvel Studios sub, so we are expected to be excited, but "Marvel actor says upcoming event movie is \[superlative\]" is marketing, not news.
And Marvel needs to realize that the size of the cast isn't a selling point for everyone. Now that "slop" is the top word to describe crap content, I expect a lot of people will be describing this movie as "superhero slop."
arecbawrin2025-11-03 15:46
Moderators need to do something about that. There's like 50 superheroes in this film. I don't need to see an article a day how this is the best movie ever and they are blown away and every day was a dream on set.
-Boston-Terrier-2025-11-03 16:26
You're 100% right that this is marketing and Doom is one of fiction's most iconic villains. If the best we can do right now is "Look at how many people are in this film!" then it might be some pretty big cause for concern.
I like both Infinity War and Endgame a lot but, if I'm being honest, I think, objectively, neither are actually good movies alone or as a pair. I can practically feel the down votes after that last sentence but I think almost everything great about both comes down to how well they stuck the landing of the 18 previous movies. It was a great send off for the Infinity Saga even if Thanos' motivations made no real sense, the sudden Thanos/Gamora plotline felt as forced as it was, and there were so many people on screen that it frequently felt too chaotic. It also helps that so much of the plot would be developed over the course of the previous 18 movies.
It's hard for me to see how a movie with such a gigantic cast is going to have much in the way of a storyline. I'd say I'm hopeful that the MCU is turning the Infinity Saga formula on its head and the Doom Saga is starting with the mega movie to define the next decade but, with Secret Wars coming a year later, this seems to just be a standalone film.
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:24
I realize that people are hyping this up and saying things like "IW and Endgame had a lot of actors and that made it work".
IW and Endgame were a two-part series finale to a tv show. They worked because they took a bunch of different character arcs and tied them off.
What are the character arcs in Multiverse Saga? What's the *story* of Multiverse Saga? Who are the main heroes and what do they want/need and how does Doom factor into that?
Unless Marvel has an answer to this, the movie's just going to be wall-to-wall cameos.
CaptHayfever2025-11-03 20:43
> I expect a lot of people will be describing this movie as "superhero slop."
Those people call Dark Knight & Winter Soldier "superhero slop". There is no winning over those people. The challenge is just to stop those people from *chasing OTHER people away*.
TelenorTheGNP2025-11-03 15:30
I am cautiously optimistic.
Ivan_Redditor2025-11-03 15:32
I have a feeling that Doomsday and Secret Wars are gonna be to Marvel what Babylon is to movies; an awesome, gripping love letter to the media that we enjoyed.
SlashOfLife52962025-11-03 15:36
Let’s hope so
mfc901252025-11-03 15:42
I’m still having a hard time figuring out how a cast this large will be able to share any meaningful screen time without this movie being 3:30. Maybe that’s their plan, but even still, that only appeals to fans like us. Doomsday needs to be great, which means Doom needs to be great, which means RDJ needs time to develop Doom however that will happen, which takes screen time to achieve. I’m still not convinced that RDJ isn’t a gimmick casting meant to bring fans back, but I hope they give us a great Doom.
Greygor2025-11-03 16:33
With regards cast size wasn't the exact same thing said about Infinity Was and then again for Endgame?
Plus, prior to Infinity War Thanos had no real character and that turned out just fine, with the same directors.
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:27
dying for someone, anyone, to tell me what any of these characters have to do with Dr. Doom or what his arrival would mean for them
Eric_T_Meraki2025-11-03 15:48
Crazy it's his first appearance in MCU product in nearly a decade after debuting.
Endgam2025-11-03 16:37
Well, he did voice Shang-Chi in What If...? and Zombies.
Oxford082025-11-03 16:46
It’ll have been 5 years since live action, which is a lot but not at all a decade
ProductArizona2025-11-03 15:59
What does a love letter mean? Fanfare is just annoying at this point in time. Make good movies
OnlyBeGamer2025-11-03 16:04
Ok cool. But where Shang Chi 2 at?
JohnAtticus2025-11-03 16:09
Still concerned it will be over 5 years between Shang Chi live action appearances, along with other big gaps for other lesser known characters, along with so many characters being introduced in D+ shows.
If the general audience feels like they need to do homework for this movie, that will be a push factor that keeps them away.
Then you will need this thing to be one of the best MCU movies of all time to create enough of a pull to negate the homework aspect.
It won't even be enough if it's just good.
Thunderbolts was good. People still didn't go.
It needs to be great.
This movie hasn't been set up for success, they're really going to need to nail it.
I'm hoping they focus on making a good movie that appeals to the general audience as a top priority, and stay away from cheap fan services like revealing Doom is really Tony Stark because some emotionally immature fans cannot grapple with Stark dying and keep campaigning to have him reincarnated.
Oxford082025-11-03 16:43
Good news about marvel homework is that it’s only as much of a problem as people choose to make it. Infinity war/endgame was the first movie for plenty of people that later did full MCU rewatches and got really invested. At the end of the day, you can walk into any marvel movie and enjoy it for what it is without needing to watch a billion things before it. Homework isn’t homework, it’s just extra credit that’s adds fun but non-crucial context to a story
TypeExpert2025-11-03 17:16
If you look at the official cast from the livestream, the only two characters that are from Disney+ are Torres(new falcon) and John Walker. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Even then, those two are now movie characters since they both made their theatrical debuts this year. People should know who they are a little more now.
CaptHayfever2025-11-03 20:42
> If the general audience feels like they need to do homework for this movie, that will be a push factor that keeps them away.
That's a marketing problem, not a filmmaking problem. They should take the James Gunn approach & be more proactive about publicly & directly shooting down misinformation.
Obvious-End-79482025-11-04 03:08
>Thunderbolts was good. People still didn't go.
>It needs to be great.
Also don't discount the importance of momentum. Marvel was at their absolute peak in Phase 3 leading into Infinity War and Endgame. It was just non-stop hits to the point people thought they could do no wrong. Current Marvel has been very hit and miss, which makes people hesitant.
Also, goddamn going to the movies is expensive as shit now.
JohnAtticus2025-11-04 03:50
All true as well.
SirDigbyChknCaesar2025-11-03 16:12
Okay, Simu. You seem like a nice guy but why don't you settle down there, buddy. Have a juice box.
Connorm9972025-11-03 16:17
I doubt he's seen the movie yet so he's just saying some positive things about his employers
_IratePirate_2025-11-03 16:35
I’ve never heard the terms “a love letter to” more than when mfs on the internet talk about marvel movies
“Ooh Spider-Man 3 is a love letter to Spider-Man fans”
“The Marvels is a love letter to female super hero fans”
“Fantastic Four is a love letter to original marvel fans”
Like jeezus get a new fuckin term. Y’all sound like AI
Wooden_Passage_26122025-11-03 16:38
This is going to be everything that I want.

NavidsonRecords882025-11-03 16:49
“A love letter to” is the movie equivalent to when a sports team says one of their players is “in the best shape of his life”
mrbaryonyx2025-11-03 17:44
when you hear "this is for the fans", you run
cooscoos32025-11-03 18:18
I’ll reserve judgement, as he has to be very biased.
He’s finally been given another shot in a movie after years of waiting, of course he’s going to say that.
Joebranflakes2025-11-03 18:25
I really hope we aren’t looking at Eternals 2.0. That movie suffered from severe character clutter.
SWPrequelFan815662025-11-03 19:30
>“Love Letter To The Entire” Superhero Genre
I'll keep that in mind when Doom punches a hole clean through Ant-Man /j
electriclightthemoon2025-11-03 19:56
Just have a good story and balance the humor and drama.
Wooden-Radish-90082025-11-03 20:49
You cant really market this movie as a "love letter" because this fan base fucking hates everything.
Just market it as "Avengers Doomsday: Something to Bitch About" and watch the money roll in.
ChuckGreenwald2025-11-03 21:02
The superhero genre could use some more hate letters.
storksghast2025-11-03 21:03
I've had it with love letters. Just make a good movie.
Switch8152025-11-03 21:11
It is a "Dream Come True" for him because he is in it.
TDStarchild2025-11-03 21:53
I look forward to when it’s another stellar Russos/Marvel project with emotional stakes and awesome first time on screen interactions of cool characters
God forbid they be excited about what they’re creating while people pretending to be fans are catastrophizing at any positive words
Notoriously_So2025-11-04 00:09
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Take it easy. I'm sure the movie will be good, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here, they haven't even released a teaser. Marketing this *now* when it's still over a year out is almost ridiculous.
Commentaires
This has poor build up and heroes that struggle to crack 400 mil much less 500 mil.
>”Yeah, three: dream come true."
>”I mean, there are just so many actors in it, and getting to work with those people as peers is really incredible because I grew up watching so many of them. It feels, in a lot of ways, like a love letter to the entire genre of superhero movies. And I think there’s something really fun about that."
>”For all the misfits and the weirdos and the underdogs that grew up reading comic books and feeling like there was hope for them somehow – that it didn’t matter if they didn’t fit in – I think there’s just always a special place in my heart for that entire genre."
If you are twenty year old boy watching Doomsday--the target audience for that movie--the first Avengers movie came out when you were seven and became the most successful non-James Cameron movie ever. I don't think its a misfit thing anymore.
Excuse me... I was very much one of those misfits when I was collecting comics in the mid-90s. I am in my mid-40s now.
Hey look we got all the spidermen and X-men you grew up with over the last 20 years!
Hopefully they give him some great stuff in the movie, I’m hoping for him and Gambit to have a fight where they’re throwing rings and cards at each other.
That's nothing special considering that's probably an apt description for like, 80% of all Marvel protagonists nowadays...
Nobody whose last name isn't "Richards", and who doesn't already have a close enough relationship with Tony Stark to be freaked out that he's evil now, is going to have a personal reason for opposing Doom. I genuinely can't imagine what most of the characters' arcs are going to be in the movie.
Here's hoping Doomsday won't be a messy cameo galore where fan service takes front seat and plot is an afterthought. Fingers crossed!
I could tell you a solid year out of IW what Thanos' arrival would mean for Tony (would have to face his fears), Steve (would be faced with a threat he couldn't "optimism and teamwork" his way out of), Gamora (has to confront her dad), Vision (is going to be targeted because of the thing in his head) and T'Challa (is going to have to put his nation on the frontline, since he promised Killmonger he'd do more to protect the whole world).
I couldn't tell you what Shang-Chi and Sam Wilson and Suri and Yelena have to do with Dr. Doom; like what their emotional connection to him is.
"The whole multiverse is going to collapse" what does that even mean? Why should I care?
I'm sure if it's written well, they'll come up with a way to make me care, I guess, but I can't see how like half of these characters will fit into it.
But it also means I don't really have anything to get hyped for in the way I was hyped for the others. I honestly think if they had a movie like Avengers 1 where a bunch of the new characters to come together to fight one villain, I'd be more excited.
I'm already girding myself for that and preparing to ignore all of it, because that's just how the culture works now. Like what you like, let people like stuff, and if it's not your bag move on.
More than a year away but we're already building hype.
December 2026, here we come!
I don’t want to get super confident we will get the best movie ever… but MCU really needs this movie to work, so I’m confident they will try their best to make a quality movie.
The Multiverse Saga just didn't have the same planning and attention to detail that the Infinity Saga did but it feels the whole thing went off the rails the moment Majors was arrested.
It *really* feels like Disney, Marvel et. al have been trying to speedrun a new IW/Endgame because they want that again, only someone explained to them that "IW/E only happened after thirty movies of build up" so they went "ok, so have thirty movies and shows come out over the course of three years, is that enough build up? It better be!"
Like, I know IW was like "the big Marvel movie", but it was also still Avengers 3. Like--it's the second sequel to Avengers 1. It exists because there was an Avengers 1, and it continues the plot and character arcs from that movie. **We needed a new Avengers 1, not a new Avengers 3, and we never got it**.
You're 100% right but I would take that a bit further and say we needed buildup to a new Avengers 1.
I mean that first movie didn't just come out of nowhere. The MCU introduced the characters but they also introduced the Avengers Initiative, Nick Fury, Shield, etc. and actively recruited Iron Man on screen which all led to The Avengers and it all made sense. I don't even know who The Avengers are anymore. Fury, Black Widow, Rodgers, and Stark are all gone. Jeremy Renner and Mark Ruffalo don't appear to be in the cast so Hawkeye and Hulk are someplace else.
"Who even are The Avengers at this point?" is a question that should have been answered before the next Avengers movie.
But you're right. We should have a new Avengers 1 that shows the dynamic of the New Avengers working together for the first time like with the original Avengers.
I think the mythology around that is cool, I think Stephen Strange was a prime candidate to be front-and-center (esp. after people got weird about Brie and Chadwick dying), but it need to be a Nick Fury esque role since he's not really an Avenger. The New York Sanctum could become Avengers Mansion. Instead of building up to a "Thanos", they build up to a "Loki" (should have been Wanda, the original script for Dr. Strange 2 has her surviving, and only turning bad at the very end).
Then it's just a matter of assembling a few heroes (*a few! Again its Avengers 1 not Infinity War!*) and having them get cranky with each other.
All of that buildup was there if they wanted to capitalize on it, but instead they kept building a bunch of other things, and then selling us on Kang, and oh by the way all the buildup they were doing has nothing to even do with Kang and now even less to do with Doom. Its so weird.
It was going poorly up to that point but, once that happened, the MCU really had to pivot.
I think where they went wrong was the introduction of new characters in Phase 4. They should have been more focused on dealing with the fallout of the blip and what comes next. I mean half of the world disappeared in IW and it's *barely* ever mentioned again. The world should have been in absolute chaos and storylines should have revolved around restoring order. Villains don't have to keep getting bigger and badder. Sometimes the villain just has to be a rouge nation trying to create super soldiers or whatever.
Phase 5 should have been building up to a city level event which culminated in the old Avengers passing the torch to new Avengers in a new Avengers 1.
Phase 6 should have been building up to planetary level event which culminated in a new Avengers 2.
And, while all that's going on, we see hints of Phase 7 and the multiversal threat or whatever.
Then start the cycle all over again.
And I understand the thing with Jonathan Majors, but I also think they really shouldn't have been putting that many eggs in that basket.
They were so interested in building characters in Phase 4; but they had so many characters already in the tank! I really think they could have just moved forward with Parker, Strange, T'Challa and Danvers, but Brie Larson made people mad I guess and T'Challa's actor died and Parker's actor works with a different production company, and that *just* leaves Strange (who I think is asking for more money now).
But the Russos have proven they can pull off a massive movie like this, so I'll put my faith in them and hope for the best.
* First, Brave New World showed they could get the budgets back down again.
* Next, Thunderbolts showed they could get the quality back again even on a lower budget.
* Then, First Steps showed they could get back to profitability again, without sacrificing the quality *or* jacking up the budget too much.
With the groundwork now laid for improved public perception, 2026 will be a one-two punch of Spider-Man & Avengers to finish the job of winning the GA back.
...and then all the goodwill they had from those movies kind of fizzled out when the audience (MCU or not) realized there wasn't really a plan for afterwards. It *felt* like (not saying it's true) they kept introducing new heroes with minimal crossover. Phase 4/5 came and went with a bunch of new heroes introduced or sequels to heroes, but no Avengers movie to tie them all together and make it feel coherent.
So my hope is that these two Avengers movies are able to reignite people's excitement and bring them in, and then *keep* that momentum going with a coherent, actual plan that isn't too much all at once. You can just recreate the Phase 1-3 formula of 3 central characters (Iron Man, Cap, and Thor) that get a movie every phase or so along with new heroes, and every phase is capped off with an Avengers movie.
The general audience won't always keep up with every new Marvel flick, but the Avengers name still has enough power to draw them in. Here's to hoping the lessons they learned from 2025 carry over into the new phase, it can only mean good things for the fans.
I'm actually looking forward to the second seasons of X-Men 97, YFNSM, and Daredevil Born Again more than I am Doomsday.
Yes everyone loves to point out how Infinity War pulled it off, but try rewatching it. Most of the non-Thanos scenes move at a pretty rapid pace specifically so they can give Thanos room to breathe. Which works because all the other characters and the current state of things are established leading into Infinity War.
.....Now consider that we have even more characters this time, many which haven't met each other (DESPITE all the shows which really just introduced a bunch of new characters most of which aren't even announced for the film), the Fox X-Men characters which will basically be new versions albeit played by the same actors), and while juggling all these characters they have to set up **Doctor Fucking Doom**. A character arguably just as iconic to the Marvel brand as Spider-Man. A character fans have waited decades to see be finally portrayed properly. A character..... who in his first scene we've gotten he's already showing his face to someone when Doom never shows his face to anyone. *He even tries to avoid looking at it himself.*
*.....Yeah.*
And Marvel needs to realize that the size of the cast isn't a selling point for everyone. Now that "slop" is the top word to describe crap content, I expect a lot of people will be describing this movie as "superhero slop."
I like both Infinity War and Endgame a lot but, if I'm being honest, I think, objectively, neither are actually good movies alone or as a pair. I can practically feel the down votes after that last sentence but I think almost everything great about both comes down to how well they stuck the landing of the 18 previous movies. It was a great send off for the Infinity Saga even if Thanos' motivations made no real sense, the sudden Thanos/Gamora plotline felt as forced as it was, and there were so many people on screen that it frequently felt too chaotic. It also helps that so much of the plot would be developed over the course of the previous 18 movies.
It's hard for me to see how a movie with such a gigantic cast is going to have much in the way of a storyline. I'd say I'm hopeful that the MCU is turning the Infinity Saga formula on its head and the Doom Saga is starting with the mega movie to define the next decade but, with Secret Wars coming a year later, this seems to just be a standalone film.
IW and Endgame were a two-part series finale to a tv show. They worked because they took a bunch of different character arcs and tied them off.
What are the character arcs in Multiverse Saga? What's the *story* of Multiverse Saga? Who are the main heroes and what do they want/need and how does Doom factor into that?
Unless Marvel has an answer to this, the movie's just going to be wall-to-wall cameos.
Those people call Dark Knight & Winter Soldier "superhero slop". There is no winning over those people. The challenge is just to stop those people from *chasing OTHER people away*.
Plus, prior to Infinity War Thanos had no real character and that turned out just fine, with the same directors.
If the general audience feels like they need to do homework for this movie, that will be a push factor that keeps them away.
Then you will need this thing to be one of the best MCU movies of all time to create enough of a pull to negate the homework aspect.
It won't even be enough if it's just good.
Thunderbolts was good. People still didn't go.
It needs to be great.
This movie hasn't been set up for success, they're really going to need to nail it.
I'm hoping they focus on making a good movie that appeals to the general audience as a top priority, and stay away from cheap fan services like revealing Doom is really Tony Stark because some emotionally immature fans cannot grapple with Stark dying and keep campaigning to have him reincarnated.
Even then, those two are now movie characters since they both made their theatrical debuts this year. People should know who they are a little more now.
That's a marketing problem, not a filmmaking problem. They should take the James Gunn approach & be more proactive about publicly & directly shooting down misinformation.
>It needs to be great.
Also don't discount the importance of momentum. Marvel was at their absolute peak in Phase 3 leading into Infinity War and Endgame. It was just non-stop hits to the point people thought they could do no wrong. Current Marvel has been very hit and miss, which makes people hesitant.
Also, goddamn going to the movies is expensive as shit now.
“Ooh Spider-Man 3 is a love letter to Spider-Man fans”
“The Marvels is a love letter to female super hero fans”
“Fantastic Four is a love letter to original marvel fans”
Like jeezus get a new fuckin term. Y’all sound like AI

He’s finally been given another shot in a movie after years of waiting, of course he’s going to say that.
I'll keep that in mind when Doom punches a hole clean through Ant-Man /j
Just market it as "Avengers Doomsday: Something to Bitch About" and watch the money roll in.
God forbid they be excited about what they’re creating while people pretending to be fans are catastrophizing at any positive words
