My opinion : Tom Holland's Spider-Man is the most Spider-Man acting Spider-Man
Now don't get me wrong, all the other love action Spider-men are really really good and my favourite la Spider-man is tobey not tom.
But the way toms Spider-Man acted, he joked during fights he did random stuff that a new teenage Spider-Man would do. Granted he had other superheros in his movies but still.
He did flips when someone asked, helped civilians not just by saving them but also helping them with mundane stuff. That's the most Spider-man thing to do ever.
And now in his 4th movie he would finally be the broke, hurt, alone and depressed Spider-Man we have been yearning for.
But the way toms Spider-Man acted, he joked during fights he did random stuff that a new teenage Spider-Man would do. Granted he had other superheros in his movies but still.
He did flips when someone asked, helped civilians not just by saving them but also helping them with mundane stuff. That's the most Spider-man thing to do ever.
And now in his 4th movie he would finally be the broke, hurt, alone and depressed Spider-Man we have been yearning for.
Commentaires
His spider sense in ffh and nwh, the show of strength in homecoming and fluid movements in ffh. Granted andrew was the best with motion and stuff.but stilll I am taking about the overall.
Tobey, Andrew, and Tom were all good in their own ways, but none of them have truly nailed the character. I have yet to see a live-action performance of the character that made me go, "Yep, that's it. That's exactly how the Spider-Man in the comics would act." I think Andrew came the closest though.
When I see spider-man. They basically are none of those things I was exposed to about the character.
If anything what influenced me for the character was learning to write and understanding (to the best I can anyway) how tropes and interpretations no longer mean the same thing, today. And how each actor and writer was able to capture a snapshot of culture and forge it into a spider-man.
I say not preachy, because he doesn't tell people how to be, he just tried to help them be better. If he can make someone a tiny bit less awful, he sees it as a victory.
He also refuses to give up on anyone. Ever. Peters the beaten girlfriend, with the violent boyfriend, going "I can change him".
Its the quips for me that are most important though. It's why I favor spectacular over all others. "Oh no .. smile knives .. my weakness .. " with him joking, to him stopping and helping that kid with his science experiment, and fixing it for him. Those are the moments you absolutely need in a Spiderman film.
It's why Spiderman doesn't work so well on the big scale. He doesn't get those one on one interactions that let him shine as a character. All of his best moments are one on one, or in small groups. Him stopping the train, and everyone carrying him in Toby's Spiderman was awesome though. And Garfields Spiderman getting shot in the leg, so the city workers move the cranes lower to get him to the building. All of which still take place in New York.
Him in some giant battle like in endgame just doesn't work the same for him.
Give it a few more years, and an older Spiderman standing up with an iron man, or a Thor, face to face with a thanos, makes more sense. He always gets killed off, or replaced, or something before he gets that big though.
You won't see Spiderman leading the avengers, ever. An older, wiser Spiderman absolutely could, but they'll never do it.
They haven't showed his intelligence at all really either, besides this. Pete's a genius, and they just have him being confused and out smarter all the time.
Amazing spiderman with Edith would have first asked if there was a way to get money from it. Lol
And the fact that Tony says he hired him for a paid internship, sent him to germanyz and never gave him a dime, is super weird. Then Tony dies without leaving him a dime, and pepper doesn't help them out either. And they shitcan happy, and leave him broke too? Or maybe I'm forgetting, but in the last Spiderman movie happy wasn't working, but in deadpool he was the gatekeeper for the avengers?..
I don't think there has been an excellent both yet
Maybe the next one should be a bit more Deadpool/Reynolds style?
Garfield's the best actor out of the bunch by far too. If you haven't seen "tick tick boom", you really need to. I don't care for musicals at all, but I wept watching this film.
And the Spider-Man writers are evil
Andrew was too weird and his romance was lmao weird. I don’t have the words to describe it but you will know what I mean if you rewatch any of his and Gwen’s scenes.
And I just don’t think Tobey is that good at acting honestly in the Raimi movies. Also I just do not like the campy tone of it with the weird transitions.
I have no clue what you mean. Andrew and Emma had great chemistry and they were believable to me. You're gonna have to do better than 'weird' and 'I don't have the words'.
Holland is second and has the best movies.
Never liked Maguire. But his movies were decent. Always thought he did SM well but his PP was awful. Parker was never the completely socially incompetent and unconfident nerd. The second he got super powers he was a wise cracking and sarcastic charisma beacon. Maguires Parker remains a loser the entire trilogy.
Having said that, middle aged Maguire-Parker was great.
Garfield is by far the most Spidermanesque.
But he has had the least amount of on screen time, so Holland's has the most time to showz and change.
Oh, also the Russos. As they were the 1st to direct & to set the tone to MCU spidey