In Civil War, Ross is talking to the team about the Sokovia Accords. He points to the events in New York, DC, Sokovia and Lagos as reasons why the Avengers need to be kept in check. The issue? New York and DC were not the fault of the Avengers.

New York was Shield’s fault. They were messing with the Tessect and drew the attention of Thanos and Loki. Shield even tried to nuke NYC during the invasion and would have if the Avengers hadn’t been there. No Avengers means either a successful invasion or a nuked NYC.

DC was Sheild’s fault too. Hydra was able to grow within their midst and Fury didn’t even have a real plan in place to deal with the weirdness going on. No Avengers means Hydra wipes out millions of people and takes over the world.

Sokovia was full on the team’s fault because they created Ultron. Lagos was the team’s fault because if they weren’t there, Rumlow wouldn’t have tried to blow himself up.

I get that this is a common trope in comics that world leaders use against heroes. Someone still should have spoken up about NY and DC though.

Voir le contenu lié