Official concept art of Mister Fantastic for Fantastic Four: First Steps
Commentaires
Heisenburgo2025-09-29 16:47
He looks so cool with the black gloves belt and boots. Hope they use that look in a sequel
Alonest992025-10-01 12:16
I agree. Or maybe for Doomsday or Secret Wars.
PiperPeriwinkle2025-09-29 18:37
The fact that [Pedro Pascal looks and acts like Pedro Pascal](https://compote.slate.com/images/24b107e3-47aa-4246-a95b-6b5f8c45c881.jpeg?crop=1560%2C1040%2Cx0%2Cy0&width=1280) in almost everything has definitely dimmed my excitement at seeing him in roles.
Hes in the tier of Jason Statham/Zooey Deschanel acting, where the play ostenisbly the same character in everything. He is always the morally conflicted, protective, loyal family oriented father figure.
Jason/Zooey/Pedro are *very good* at that specific role, not a knock to them... Im just tired of seeing it from them all the time.
GarlicBreadOutrage2025-09-29 20:00
You're absolutely insane if you think he acts the same in The Last of Us, Fantastic Four, Game of Thrones or in The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent.
PiperPeriwinkle2025-09-29 20:10
Ill use gpt for description, so you dont accuse me of *bias*:
Marcus: Responsible, caring, heroic, nurturing father figure
Oberyn: Charismatic, passionate, vengeful, confident, relentless, leader, family man.
Din Djarin: Responsible, caring, heroic, nurturing father figure
Pero Tovar: Loyal, skeptical, pragmatic, survivor instinct
Francisco “Catfish” Morales: Loyal, dependable, cautious, family-oriented
I just asked for his roles in the past decade.
Yes, there are minor difference between the characters, but the venn diagram has a metric fuckton of overlap from almost every single character.
-----
Where do you disagree?
ckal092025-09-29 22:15
With what? A bunch of broad descriptive words? This is like a 5th grade homework assignment, why are you proud of this lol
Plus I was talking about your laughable comparison to Jason Statham
PiperPeriwinkle2025-09-29 22:17
> With what? A bunch of broad descriptive words? This is like a 5th grade homework assignment, why are you proud of this lol
And what do those words communicate? Im not *proud* of it... Im asking you to engage with the actual thought.
> Plus I was talking about your laughable comparison to Jason Statham
In what way do you think I was comparing him? How is that *laughable*?
ckal092025-09-29 22:25
This guy actually thinks people want to engage with his slop lol. can’t even defend a thought of their own and are asking others to critically engage with them critically 😂
PiperPeriwinkle2025-09-29 23:27
> This guy actually thinks people want to engage with his slop lol.
Mate, you apparently dont have the capacity to articulate *why* its slop.
Notice how youre not actually engaging with the point *at all*.
Buddy youre embarrassing yourself.
--------------------
Heres a summary of this interaction:
1st comment: My opinion
2nd comment: Thats laughable
1st reply: Heres an unbiased summary of why its not laughable
Your reply: Thats a bunch of words
My 2nd reply: Please engage with those words
Your 2nd reply: ThAts SlOp
Were here. <-
DuckyHornet2025-09-30 13:04
I feel like you shot yourself in the foot by fessing up to using ChatGPT. If you'd have just presented the list as your own, you might have gotten some engagement like you claim you want. But instead you posted a block of predictive text like a cat dropping off a dead bird on someone's pillow
PiperPeriwinkle2025-09-30 15:15
> If you'd have just presented the list as your own, you might have gotten some engagement like you claim you want.
I presented my own idea and was called *insane* and *delusional*.
I used an unbiased source to help refute the claim, on something that is so personal and subjective as the "traits of characters across different fictional universes"
> But instead you posted a block of predictive text like a cat dropping off a dead bird on someone's pillow
If people are so braindead as to not understand the purpose of disconnecting *my subjectivity* from attempting to find a general truth, I cant help them. They need to foster greater critical thinking skills.
I was *literally* avoiding a scenario where the conversation was:
A: "I think he is *X* in A, B and C"
B: "Hes not X"
A: "I think he is. I think he is because of *g*, *h*, *k*"
B: "Hes not X"
------------
See how this gets in the weeds of *personal opinion*?
GarlicBreadOutrage2025-09-29 19:58
The concept art kinda looks like that actor Pedro Pascal from Wonder Woman 1984.
AmericanDoughboy2025-09-30 18:20
Nah. Looks more like that guy in The Last of Us. You know, what’s his name.
Infinitereadsreddits2025-10-01 11:20
I don't think they look alike. This one has a moustache
superpencil1212025-09-29 20:03
The picture in the right looks like Jim from the office
SubhasTheJanitor2025-09-30 01:10
Concept art on the right looks like Tom Burke. Wonder if he was considered.
Grayx_28872025-09-30 17:58
He should have grown a beard in the movie.
cleaninfresno2025-09-30 23:29
He can’t lol. He barely could for Joel
Alonest992025-10-01 12:15
He should’ve been clean shaven in the movie. I mean, he did it for Wonder Woman of all things
Burgoonius2025-10-01 04:41
They almost had him with the Joel hair lol
BaronZhiro2025-10-01 06:22
Not a huge deal for me, but I still wish they’d gone one way or another (original baby blue with black, or Byrne’s darkest blue with white). This seems like the mellowest combination to me, particularly by covering Ben with it.
Ok_Perspective_51482025-10-02 05:57
I’m glad it looks like they never considered mustache off. Have you seen him in WW?!
Commentaires
Hes in the tier of Jason Statham/Zooey Deschanel acting, where the play ostenisbly the same character in everything. He is always the morally conflicted, protective, loyal family oriented father figure.
Jason/Zooey/Pedro are *very good* at that specific role, not a knock to them... Im just tired of seeing it from them all the time.
---------------------
Joel: Hardened, traumatized, fiercely protective, paternal, morally conflicted, leader.
Reed: emotionally conflicted, caring, protective, family-oriented, conflicted leader, charismatic gravitas
Marcus: Responsible, caring, heroic, nurturing father figure
Oberyn: Charismatic, passionate, vengeful, confident, relentless, leader, family man.
Din Djarin: Responsible, caring, heroic, nurturing father figure
Pero Tovar: Loyal, skeptical, pragmatic, survivor instinct
Francisco “Catfish” Morales: Loyal, dependable, cautious, family-oriented
---------------
I just asked for his roles in the past decade.
Yes, there are *minor* difference between the characters, but the venn diagram has a metric fuckton of overlap from almost every single character.
Ironic.
I gave my opinion, and then accused of insanity I directly communicated *why I was using gpt* in order to mitigate for *bias*.
Buddy learn to read before commenting on anyone else's mental acuity.
------------------
Joel: Hardened, traumatized, fiercely protective, paternal, morally conflicted, leader.
Reed: emotionally conflicted, caring, protective, family-oriented, conflicted leader, charismatic gravitas
Marcus: Responsible, caring, heroic, nurturing father figure
Oberyn: Charismatic, passionate, vengeful, confident, relentless, leader, family man.
Din Djarin: Responsible, caring, heroic, nurturing father figure
Pero Tovar: Loyal, skeptical, pragmatic, survivor instinct
Francisco “Catfish” Morales: Loyal, dependable, cautious, family-oriented
I just asked for his roles in the past decade.
Yes, there are minor difference between the characters, but the venn diagram has a metric fuckton of overlap from almost every single character.
-----
Where do you disagree?
Plus I was talking about your laughable comparison to Jason Statham
And what do those words communicate? Im not *proud* of it... Im asking you to engage with the actual thought.
> Plus I was talking about your laughable comparison to Jason Statham
In what way do you think I was comparing him? How is that *laughable*?
Mate, you apparently dont have the capacity to articulate *why* its slop.
Notice how youre not actually engaging with the point *at all*.
Buddy youre embarrassing yourself.
--------------------
Heres a summary of this interaction:
1st comment: My opinion
2nd comment: Thats laughable
1st reply: Heres an unbiased summary of why its not laughable
Your reply: Thats a bunch of words
My 2nd reply: Please engage with those words
Your 2nd reply: ThAts SlOp
Were here. <-
I presented my own idea and was called *insane* and *delusional*.
I used an unbiased source to help refute the claim, on something that is so personal and subjective as the "traits of characters across different fictional universes"
> But instead you posted a block of predictive text like a cat dropping off a dead bird on someone's pillow
If people are so braindead as to not understand the purpose of disconnecting *my subjectivity* from attempting to find a general truth, I cant help them. They need to foster greater critical thinking skills.
I was *literally* avoiding a scenario where the conversation was:
A: "I think he is *X* in A, B and C"
B: "Hes not X"
A: "I think he is. I think he is because of *g*, *h*, *k*"
B: "Hes not X"
------------
See how this gets in the weeds of *personal opinion*?