Something about the Avengers films that pisses me off.
When the Avengers are blamed for the things that happened.
Like one character saying at the end of the first Avengers, "this was THEIR fight. Where are they now?"
And when Ross mentions New York 2012, Washington D.C in Winter Soldier.
Why are they blaming Avengers for those?
Hydra and Loki sought out their evil plans. If the Avengers hadn't intervened, the world would've been screwed. Yet they keep acting like the Avengers wreak havoc by saving them.
Granted Lagos was an example of their faults. And Ultron. But literally every other instance wasn't. Even Dark World was going to end the world if Thor hadn't saved the day.
Hell, Thanos coming to Earth to collect all the infinity stones. What did Ross and others plan to do without the Avengers help?
Like one character saying at the end of the first Avengers, "this was THEIR fight. Where are they now?"
And when Ross mentions New York 2012, Washington D.C in Winter Soldier.
Why are they blaming Avengers for those?
Hydra and Loki sought out their evil plans. If the Avengers hadn't intervened, the world would've been screwed. Yet they keep acting like the Avengers wreak havoc by saving them.
Granted Lagos was an example of their faults. And Ultron. But literally every other instance wasn't. Even Dark World was going to end the world if Thor hadn't saved the day.
Hell, Thanos coming to Earth to collect all the infinity stones. What did Ross and others plan to do without the Avengers help?
Commentaires
Irl you can always claim motivation is political or personal or something. But nobody is gonna believe "aliens invaded because of this group we didn't even assemble until after the invasion had already begun (Loki sent to earth to get the tesseract)"
>captain america and his tesseract shenanigans in the first avenger got the tesseract to where it is in 2012.
Neither of those are even close to being "because of the avengers" like Ultron was. Not to mention the thor/Loki conflict was because of Loki, not thor. And the tesseract shit in the 40s was because of hydra/red skull, not captain america.
And that doesn't even matter because there's probably little to no public knowledge of these events.
>Steve Rogers: Are you saying it's our fault?
>Vision: I'm saying there may be a causality. Our very strength invites challenge. Challenge incites conflict. And conflict... breeds catastrophe. Oversight... Oversight is not an idea that can be dismissed out of hand.
Batman: Escalation?
Jim Gordon: We start carrying semi-automatics, they buy automatics. We start wearing Kevlar, they buy armor piercing rounds.
Batman: And?
Jim Gordon: And, you're wearing a mask. Jumping off rooftops. Now, take this guy.
Jim Gordon: Armed robbery, double homicide, has a taste for the theatrical, like you. Leaves a calling card.
In fact its good that shield found it, what if they never got it out of the ocean and Thanos got the gem without even noticing.
We live in a world where some morons blame Obama for not doing anything to stop 9/11, almost a decade before he was ever president. I can absolutely believe that there's morons in the world of the MCU who would blame others, whether it's the Avengers, politicians, or even marginalized groups, for alien attacks, no matter how nonsensical it would be for them to do so.
Because they do. Some people being saved doesn't erase the ones being killed by collateral damage. Innocent people die in these battles and if their deaths happen because of the Avengers being reckless then it's still their fault, regardless of them saving the world in the process.
>the public should just stfu and thank their god-saviors
This is idiotic. If your family gets bombed with the excuse of fighting terrorists you're not gonna be thanking the people who dropped the bombs and call them gods, are you?
Without opposition and struggle, we wouldn't have the films. The stupidity and misunderstanding of others is a feature of humanity and the MCU, not a bug.
[Siam was able to hold off the French militarily for a couple years, & then ceded a lot of land to them in a treaty, quickly adopted European customs, & brokered business deals with the British.](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1dc20m/how_did_siam_thailand_avoid_colonization_by/)
They’re just afraid of the idea that the Avengers could be seen as a higher authority than them. Therefore, they put into place the Accords to give *themselves* the power over the Avengers.
Iron Man supporting the Accords always felt out of character to me. I know he felt guilty about Ultron, but they establish his distrust of governments as early as Iron Man 1. He of all people knows how dangerous “weapons”, which is what the government considered the Avengers, could be in the wrong hands.
Even in Winter Soldier, he was targeted by a corrupt government agency and the guy leading the Tony witch hunt in IM2 was in on it.
Thats one of his first points to steve, it wouldnt be a single government but a council of the world (however much of the world that would actually represent is up to debate lol)
Which was one of caps points, how do we know they are serving the interests of the world and not a few corrupt individuals like with shield
But from the outside, the guy who's Monday morning quarter backing? Yeah, he's pointing out every move they did wrong because it get's him points and allows him to create a scapegoat.
Civilians lost their lives, companies were probably ruined. Billions of dollars of property damage. This wasn't an "act of god", this was a bunch of people fighting. Someone needs to be held accountable, and unfortunately, the Avengers were the obvious targets.
Just a blatant attempt to control the people they fear are above them. They definitely don't care about all the public property damage and deaths other than using it to put the blame on them.
Yes collateral damage unfortunately happens but there's nothing the Avengers can do about it other than trying to ensure as little damage as possible. It can never be zero.
After the fighting is done the Avengers disappear. Thor and Iron Man don’t stick around to clear rubble and continue the rescue efforts that likely go on for weeks. They show up one day, fuck shit up, and then disappear
First off, SHIELD = Avengers. I’m not saying that’s literally true, but I think that would be effectively true for a lot of people. SHIELD kicked off the whole mess by screwing with the Tesseract and bringing Loki to Earth. SHIELD formed the Avengers and two SHIELD agents were founding Avengers, and Hawkeye was the guy in charge of security when the Tesseract brought Loki. Hawkeye also helped Loki do all sorts of bad things, and he personally murdered a ton of people. Hulk went nuts and helped Hawkeye almost take down a helicarrier plus help Loki escape. Then there are the two killer magic things from NYC - the Tesseract is tied to Thor, Loki’s scepter was later used by the Avengers to create Ultron, and used by Hydra (AKA SHIELD) to make the wonder twins, who became Avengers but were initially evil. And then there’s all the collateral damage and stuff.
The Winter Soldier DC case isn’t quite as clear, except if you start from the premise of SHIELD = Avengers. SHIELD turned evil. Cap, Hawkeye, BW were SHIELD agents at the time, and they were running missions to help Hydra without questioning their orders - and remember, Hawkeye had helped Loki, and BW has a bad history, too. Tony helped upgrade the Insight helicarriers, yet again helping empower an enemy. So you have four Avengers all helping SHIELD/Hydra, including their two super spies, and they don’t see what’s going on and don’t do anything about it? The Avengers are reckless, irresponsible, and they don’t see what’s happening right under their noses.
I think that narrative would sell to *plenty* of people without too much trouble.
"If I lost a couple of nukes, you bet there'd be consequences".
Would have been a perfrct opportunity to tell him that he helped create two nukes, Hulk and Abomination. And his consequences turned out to be becoming Secretary of State.
(Not to mention, if you regard AoS--not to open up that argument, but just as a fun thematic point, if anybody tries to start a fight it's on them--then Ross *HAD* just lost a nuke himself & was likely facing no consequences at all for it.)
In the audio commentary for “Avengers”, he mentions that he vetoed having a few quinjets slide off the helicarrier during the battle, saying “I feel like people would die, and then the Avengers are bad people”. This was years before “Civil War”.
Hulk and Tony basically tear up an entire city in South Africa. And then of course they end up having to blow up the entire city in Sokovia. Realistically the events of that movie would cause a massive global controversy and uproar especially considering Ultron was Stark’s fault. The general public would be calling for Tony’s head. The geo-political impact would probably last decades. The Accords if anything were a pretty tame response.
Imagine if you woke up tomorrow and found out Elon Musk had to blow Israel and Palestine into bits because he created an AI murder robot that decided wiping them off the face of the Earth would be the easiest solution to stop human conflict. Would the world really care that he evacuated people first and stopped his own robot.
The general public doesn't have the details, but it's not unreasonable to think there's a connection.
*gestures broadly*
Why are you believing THE BAD GUY
Of course watching the movies knowing the characters up close and personal we know they’re doing what they have to do and are fully invested in protecting the Earth but in reality people would be fucking terrified of beings like the Hulk and Thor just being able to run around and do whatever they want. Ross makes a solid point in Civil War that none of the Avengers even know where the Hulk is. All they can do is just shrug their shoulders and go “idk, we lost him somewhere”. Is it “their fault”? No, but in the real world somebody would have to take accountability for that. A lot of you would be pushing for the Accords as well.
In theory the Accords would offer that, some official legal entity to officially represent them and their actions while allowing them to continue protecting the planet. Is that actually what the Accords would be used for, probably not.
I think this is actually why they made it a point to have Hulk and Thor off world for Civil War because in my opinion the argument “against” the Avengers becomes much more clear cut and dry, while the way they made the movie as it is now allowed it to be a much more grounded conflict centered on Steve and Tony and the differences in who they are as people.
I generally do agree that it’s mostly what happened in Age of Ultron that caused the biggest issues.
Humans try to find answers and explain things and pose blame. It's just what they do.
Do you mean Civil War? Ross wasn’t in Winter Soldier.
Of many crazy MCU events, these comments are absolutely believable
They probably don’t like that Thor’s brother is the one waging the first war. The Hulk destroyed NY and loses control in Avengers, Wanda caused Hulk to kill a bunch of people, Stark made Ultron, Black Widow is basically a former war criminal. These people are all basically walking nukes.
Like if I'm a New Yorker who lost my livelihood because of the Battle of NYC, I'm not gonna give a shit if it's technically Loki's fault, I'm blaming the Avengers for taking the fight there instead of somewhere more secluded.
So they try to kill their credibility and standing in any way they can, blaming em and saying if they had worked for or with em it would have all been solved better.
Thats why they latch onto sokovia so hard, its their first real chamce at bringing heroes down a notch, without even having to manipulate optics.
For another Shield kinda was the government representative for the Supes, so once that fell not on my did it cause mass damage, not only did it spill the files on Black Widow (which probably caused way more public distrust than we give it credit for), but it also left a whole in the world government wondering who even should regulate and work alongside the Supes, which made people even more weary and distrusting of them.
Also, the accords were kinda needed if we're gonna be honest. The only reason we side against the accords is because we know the heroes on a personal level because we're the audience. In real life it would be terrifying having a bunch of elite assassins and super powered individuals just interfering whenever they feel it's right. Whatever side of the political spectrum you're on, imagine if somebody far on the opposite had powers and acted with them when they felt "was right", it's terrifying.