What is your bold/controversial MCU opinion?
What is a MCU opinion that will have you standing like this?
I’ll start
Captain America: Brave New World is really good and enjoyable. People who tear this film down are stuck in nostalgia and refuse to accept that things change, just like in the real world.
I’ll start
Captain America: Brave New World is really good and enjoyable. People who tear this film down are stuck in nostalgia and refuse to accept that things change, just like in the real world.
Commentaires
All three events messed with the MCU big time. Imagine if endgame didn’t come out in 2019!!
Whenever a franchise becomes extremely popular, a new toxic side to the fandom joins or grows.
How much more mainstream pop culture can you get?
We can see her character arc way better.
Thanos
He Who Remains
A short list of characters who utilized their own personal power to act in accordance with their own code of ethics, unconstrained by an objective decisionmaking body.
Each one of them stood, like a tree beside a river and said, "no, you move", even when the whole world was telling them they were wrong.
Steve's argument is that he has the power so he should be allowed to follow only his own code of ethics. I'm saying that this is only defensible if you're Steve Rogers, otherwise they statement is insane.
It doesn't matter that there are instances where the government does not follow a code of ethics, or that the deal he was rejecting was not good. He didn't try and negotiate a better plan. He outright rejected the notion.
I'm not saying the UN in or out of the MCU should be the ultimate arbiter of power either, I'm saying that rejecting the notion of external constraints is not rational unless your personal ethics are demonstrably unimpeachable.
But if that discussion doesn't interest you, be insulting, ignore the point, act in the way that makes you feel most superior. Act according to your own personal ethics.
During the board room discussion in CW the team getting talked down to about the dangers they pose while ignoring that they saved the world from destruction at least twice as a team (maybe more off camera, at that point. Let alone as individuals. That they discussed the innocent deaths with Slakovia is fair, but it was totally ignored that if Ultron got his way it would have killed most the planet. That said Stark did make Ultron so there is that.
There needs to be *some* sort of check on these people.
The right answer would have been, I'm not signing the accords, but I'm willing to come to the table and establish the Avengers as a body designed to check super powered individuals, and then negotiate with the UN on what that oversight looks like.
They did a great job of having Darcy and Howard go from not taking anything seriously to responsible parents.
Shouldn't be controversial but really ticks some people off when I point it out.
That's really pathetic, op. You know karma doesn't get you anything, right? I'm sorry no one in the real world provides you with the validation that you so obviously crave.
Nobody had a problem with her becoming the villain, it’s just that the execution to get her there didn’t feel earned
Instead, the show was ready first, so it tacked on an ending in which she continues playing with dark magic, and the storyline of the movie was changed to make her looking for her sons instead of Vision, with a very different ending. This is why it feels like a retcon of "WandaVision."
I don't really care what ending she gets, but I do want her to be taken seriously. I was bummed that the show went to such trouble to develop her as a well-rounded person in spite of theTV genre-hopping, whereas the movie reduced her to a one-dimensional stock villain. She deserved better.
1. I disagree, I think Loki is a good TV show and has strong hooks and pacing that makes it compelling to watch.
2. I agree that it is not a good MCU show because much of it is contrived and makes no sense when you think about it for even a minute or two. It even manages to contradict itself at times because the writing didn't focus on a consistent narrative.
So I think it's a good TV show, but I think it's a bad MCU show.
First, I really like it as a love letter to the Fox universe. Also, both Paradox and Cassandra are still great even on rewatch. But for the most part it's Deadpool doing his run-on mouth gimmick, and an avalanche of nostalgia pandering and fan service, and not much else. I don't find the humor very humorous especially on repeated viewing, and at least in the first two movies he had his friends around as sort of the straight man to balance them out. But Logan is just angry for the whole movie, and so ends up not really fulfilling that same role.
But overall I just don't feel any of the emotional elements. I don't find Deadpool's or Logan's stories really explored enough for them to land or have any weight, and in the end when they have the buddies sacrifice it feels off because they were arguing and hating each other up until that point and the turn to best friends felt like it came out of nowhere.
And the action sequences I find kind of boring, as they're mostly just invincible guys stabbing and shooting each other a bunch. Honestly by the time the big bus sequence comes (it's almost a oner, except they divide it into two with a random shot of Blind Al for some reason) I was bored and looking to see that there was still way too much movie remaining.
Also, there's a lot of poor CGI, and the pop soundtrack just does not work for me at all.
They should have done a celestial saga before the multiverse one.
That I like Far From Home?
That the title sagas was meaningless?
That Captain America The Winter Soldier is only ONE of the best MCU films.
Specifically, he wrote "616 Universe" without anything else clarifying what he meant by it.
Also (again not sure how hot this is) Thunderbolts is the 2nd-best post-Endgame film, behind only No Way Home.
I will say I liked GOTG 3, Spider-Man NWH, Shang Chi, & Wakanda Forever over thunderbolts.
2. The MCU started to be great when the first Guardians came out. No Phase 1 movie was really good.
And that's fine. Those movies were good at the time, but they learned what did and didn't work and the MCU got better with later movies.
Did he need more personality? Absolutely
Did he need to become a himbo? Absolutely not
Infinity War Thor was amazing. But then we got Fat Thor and Love and Thunder.
I feel that if there was more time between Ragnarok’s success and Infinity War’s production, Thor would have been changed to be full on comic relief even sooner.
Love and thunder just doesn’t. It tries with Jane and Gorrs back story but it doesn’t give them any time to breathe. We just rush from joke to joke to joke.
Just because something happens in the comics doesn’t mean it should happen in the movies
On-subject, here we go:
\* Iron Man, Iron Man 2, and Iron Man 3 make up the best Trilogy in the MCU hands-down
\* Wanda Maximoff should stay dead
\* Objectively speaking, Secret Invasion is qualitatively on par with Captain America: The Winter Soldier
\* Making Sharon Carter The Powerbroker was a stroke of creative genius that made perfect sense for her character
\* Dario Scardapane absolutely made the right choice in choosing to ignore Matt Murdock's appearance in She-Hulk and pretend that it never happened
This is gonna kill the positive momentum of Thunderbolts-F4-SpiderMan.
They let a lot more of their emotional moments sit and breathe, characters and stories are more varied, and most importantly their writing for woman characters have improved ten fold.
-The best of phase 4 and 5 are some of Marvel's best as a whole.
-A reset is necessary to continue life into the franchise.
With a proper showrunner and budget, it could be a solid lower budget action series for the MCU.
It should get a season 2.
Chris Evans is the most impressive piece of casting in the MCU. It's one of the most difficult roles to bring to life in a rich and compelling way, and he nailed it.
Also, if you've never seen Orphan Black, you're missing out.
Every single character needs a younger actor who can carry their individual franchises and come together for big Avengers movies.
Stop killing the fucking villains.
I liked Ant man 3 more than Ant man 2. I was surprised to find out so many people hated it.
MCU Steve Rogers is not a paragon of virtue. He's definitely not a bad person, but he seems like a MUCH better guy than he actually is because the narrative itself has marked him as the best person without really thinking about how his actions come across.
As an adaptation of the comics, I mean yeah it’s kinda ass.
He says he's Groot, but he's not.
People just don't have any actual criticism and just came up with "They didn't have any buildup with individual movies". In reality, they just cannot accept that some team up movies don't have some iron man or Cap type heroes...
I think people just can't go back after the peak that was IW and endgame. To me post endgame has introduced some of my favorite movies in the franchise like GOTG3 and thunderbolts.
For some reason people have always expected movies to be "box office busters" and its made worse with MCU since the infinity saga was such a cultural phenomenon that they can't really replicate it due to the landscape of the world at that time. I would hope that they focus more on TV shows moving forward and not push out movies every 1 to 2 years to act as a "relief period" in order to stretch out release dates.